[Gluster-users] migration operations: Stopping a migration

Eric epretorious at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 6 04:08:24 UTC 2012


On yet another related note: I  noticed that - consistent with the keeping the file system attributes - the files them selves are left intact on the old brick. Once I remove the file system attributes...

> # for x in `getfattr -m - /srv/sda7 2> /dev/null | tail -n +2` ; do setfattr -x $x /srv/sda7 ; done

....should I remove the old files? Or should I  leave the files intact and migrate back to the original brick:

> gluster> volume replace-brick Repositories 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda7 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda8 start


...and then  heal the volume?

Eric Pretorious
Truckee, CA




>________________________________
> From: Eric <epretorious at yahoo.com>
>To: "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org> 
>Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2012 5:42 PM
>Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] migration operations: Stopping a migration
> 
>
>On a related note: Now that the PoC has been completed, I'm not able to migrate back to the original brick because of the undocumented, save-you-from-yourself file system attribute feature:
>
>
>> gluster> volume replace-brick Repositories 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda8 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda7 start
>> /srv/sda7 or a prefix of it is already part of a volume
>
>
>
>Is there a simpler, more-direct method of migrating back to the original brick or should I wipe the file system attributes manually? I only ask because:
>
>
>1. the long-term effects of this strategy aren't addressed in the Administration Guide AFAICT, and;
>
>2. though the intent of the feature has merit, it lacks elegance. e.g., the addition of a "force" attribute
>
>   (like that of the commit feature) could be justified in this instance, IMHO.
>
>
>   > gluster> volume replace-brick Repositories 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda8 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda7 start force
>   > Usage: volume replace-brick <VOLNAME> <BRICK> <NEW-BRICK> {start|pause|abort|status|commit [force]}
>
>
>
>Eric Pretorious
>Truckee, CA
>
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Eric <epretorious at yahoo.com>
>>To: "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org> 
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2012 5:27 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] migration operations: Stopping a migration
>> 
>>
>>On a hunch, I attempted the "volume replace-brick <VOLNAME> <BRICK> <NEW-BRICK> commit" command and, without much fanfare, the volume information was updated:
>>
>>
>>> gluster> volume replace-brick Repositories 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda7 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda8 commit
>>> replace-brick commit successful
>>> 
>>> gluster> volume info
>>>  
>>> Volume Name: Repositories
>>> Type:
 Distributed-Replicate
>>> Volume ID: 926262ae-2aa6-4bf7-b19e-cf674431b06c
>>> Status: Started
>>> Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4
>>> Transport-type: tcp
>>> Bricks:
>>> Brick1: 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda8
>>> Brick2: 192.168.1.2:/srv/sda7
>>> Brick3: 192.168.1.1:/srv/sdb7
>>> Brick4: 192.168.1.2:/srv/sdb7
>>> 
>>> gluster> volume status
>>> Status of volume: Repositories
>>> Gluster process                        Port    Online    Pid
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Brick 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda8                24012    Y    13796
>>> Brick 192.168.1.2:/srv/sda7               
 24009    Y    4946
>>> Brick 192.168.1.1:/srv/sdb7                24010    Y    5438
>>> Brick 192.168.1.2:/srv/sdb7                24010    Y    4951
>>> NFS Server on localhost                    38467    Y    13803
>>> Self-heal Daemon on localhost                N/A    Y    13808
>>> NFS Server on 192.168.1.2                38467    Y    7969
>>> Self-heal Daemon on 192.168.1.2           
     N/A    Y    7974
>>
>>
>>The XFS attributes are still intact on the old brick, however:
>>
>>
>>> [eric at sn1 ~]$ for x in sda7 sdb7 sda8 ; do sudo getfattr -m - /srv/$x 2> /dev/null ; done
>>> # file: srv/sda7
>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-client-0
>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-client-1
>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-io-threads
>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-replace-brick
>>> trusted.gfid
>>> trusted.glusterfs.dht
>>> trusted.glusterfs.volume-id
>>> 
>>> # file: srv/sdb7
>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-client-2
>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-client-3
>>> trusted.gfid
>>> trusted.glusterfs.dht
>>> trusted.glusterfs.volume-id
>>> 
>>> # file:
 srv/sda8
>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-io-threads
>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-replace-brick
>>> trusted.gfid
>>> trusted.glusterfs.volume-id
>>
>>
>>
>>Is this intentional (i.e., leaving the the attributes intact)? Or  functionality that has yet to be implemented?
>>
>>
>>Eric Pretorious
>>Truckee, CA
>>
>>
>>
>>>________________________________
>>> From: Eric <epretorious at yahoo.com>
>>>To: "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org> 
>>>Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2012 5:05 PM
>>>Subject: [Gluster-users] migration operations: Stopping a migration
>>> 
>>>
>>>I've created a distributed replicated volume:
>>>
>>>
>>>> gluster> volume info
>>>>  
>>>> Volume Name: Repositories
>>>> Type: Distributed-Replicate
>>>> Volume ID: 926262ae-2aa6-4bf7-b19e-cf674431b06c
>>>> Status: Started
>>>> Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4
>>>> Transport-type: tcp
>>>> Bricks:
>>>> Brick1: 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda7
>>>> Brick2: 192.168.1.2:/srv/sda7
>>>> Brick3: 192.168.1.1:/srv/sdb7
>>>> Brick4: 192.168.1.2:/srv/sdb7
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>...and begun migrating data from one brick to another as a PoC:
>>>
>>>
>>>> gluster> volume replace-brick Repositories 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda7 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda8 start
>>>> replace-brick started successfully
>>>> 
>>>> gluster> volume replace-brick Repositories 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda7 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda8 status
>>>> Number of files migrated = 5147       Current file= /centos/5.8/os/x86_64/CentOS/gnome-pilot-conduits-2.0.13-7.el5.x86_64.rpm 
>>>> gluster> volume replace-brick Repositories 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda7
 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda8 status
>>>> Number of files migrated = 24631        Migration complete 
>>>
>>>
>>>After the migration is finished, though, the list of bricks is wrong:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> gluster> volume heal Repositories info                                                          
>>>> Heal operation on volume Repositories has been successful
>>>> 
>>>> Brick 192.168.1.1:/srv/sda7
>>>> Number of entries: 0
>>>> 
>>>> Brick 192.168.1.2:/srv/sda7
>>>> Number of entries: 0
>>>> 
>>>> Brick 192.168.1.1:/srv/sdb7
>>>> Number of entries: 0
>>>> 
>>>> Brick 192.168.1.2:/srv/sdb7
>>>> Number of entries: 0
>>>
>>>
>>>...and the XFS attributes are still intact on the old brick:
>>>
>>>
>>>> [eric at sn1 ~]$ for x in sda7 sdb7 sda8 ; do sudo getfattr -m - /srv/$x 2> /dev/null ; done
>>>> # file: srv/sda7
>>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-client-0
>>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-client-1
>>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-io-threads
>>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-replace-brick
>>>> trusted.gfid
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.dht
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.pump-path
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.volume-id
>>>> 
>>>> # file:
 srv/sdb7
>>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-client-2
>>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-client-3
>>>> trusted.gfid
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.dht
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.volume-id
>>>> 
>>>> # file: srv/sda8
>>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-io-threads
>>>> trusted.afr.Repositories-replace-brick
>>>> trusted.gfid
>>>> trusted.glusterfs.volume-id
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Have I missed a step? Or: Is this (i.e., clean-up) a bug or functionality that hasn't been implemented yet?
>>>
>>>
>>>Eric Pretorious
>>>Truckee, CA
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Gluster-users mailing list
>>>Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>>http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Gluster-users mailing list
>>Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Gluster-users mailing list
>Gluster-users at gluster.org
>http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120905/7ba7255d/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list