[Gluster-users] QEMU-GlusterFS native integration demo video

Fernando Frediani (Qube) fernando.frediani at qubenet.net
Mon Sep 3 08:44:39 UTC 2012


Hi Bharata
Thanks for this, very useful.

Would you be able to specify tests with mainly reads and writes. As far as I know there is a big hit and poor performance on writes in normal fuse mounts.
Are you using IOmeter or bonnie ?

Seems the results with fuse and the native qemu-glusterfs are pretty similar, am I right ?

Regards,

Fernando

-----Original Message-----
From: Bharata B Rao [mailto:bharata.rao at gmail.com] 
Sent: 03 September 2012 06:54
To: Fernando Frediani (Qube)
Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] QEMU-GlusterFS native integration demo video

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Fernando Frediani (Qube) <fernando.frediani at qubenet.net> wrote:
> Thanks for sharing it with us Bharata.
>
> I saw you have two nodes. Have you done any performance tests and if so how they compare with creating normal .qcow2 or .raw files on the filesystem, specially for the writes ?

Fernando,

In the video I was using a single node system (local brick). However I have tested QEMU-GlusterFS with 2 node scenario too.

I have some performance numbers that compare the QEMU-GlusterFS native integration with QEMU-GlusterFS FUSE mount. Were you looking for anything different ?

I don't have numbers for qcow2 or for create, but have numbers for reads for raw files.

FIO numbers for read can be found here:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-07/msg02718.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gluster-devel/2012-08/msg00063.html

I am planning to publish more numbers for other scenarios (qcow2 and writes etc) in future.

Regards,
Bharata.



More information about the Gluster-users mailing list