[Gluster-users] Very slow directory listing and high CPU usage on replicated volume

Joe Julian joe at julianfamily.org
Mon Nov 5 18:32:00 UTC 2012


I would also watch cpu and memory usage. Maybe try the deadline scheduler. Monitor your switch. Since it works fine at first, look for what changes.

Brian Candler <B.Candler at pobox.com> wrote:

>On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:10:40PM -0500, Jonathan Lefman wrote:
>>    Thanks Brian.  I tried what you recommended.  At first I was very
>>    encouraged when I saw things moving across the wire.  But about 15
>>    minutes into the transfer things ground to a halt.  I am currently
>>    running across a GigE channel.  Things were moving about 20-40
>MB/s but
>>    when things stopped moving the transfer rate is down in single
>digit
>>    kb/s.  Even doing a top level directory listing takes quite a
>while.
>
>Hmm. Maybe an strace on the client side (glusterfs FUSE process) and
>server
>side (glusterfsd) might give some clues?
>_______________________________________________
>Gluster-users mailing list
>Gluster-users at gluster.org
>http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20121105/d741d947/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-users mailing list