[Gluster-users] Gluster and public/private LAN

Andrew Holway a.holway at syseleven.de
Thu Dec 20 13:13:39 UTC 2012


Hi,

I am just setting it up again. I will let you know.

Thanks,

Andrew
On Dec 19, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Washer, Bryan wrote:

> 
> 
> How did you set it up? Did you export via NFS on the 10GB and then ran
> gluster on the IB? OR was it all native mountsŠ.if it was native
> mountsŠhow did you make it listen on a different interface from the one
> used by the bricks to talk to each other? I did not think this was
> possible.
> 
> Bryan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Holway <a.holway at syseleven.de> 
> Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:21 AM
> To: Shawn Heisey <gluster at elyograg.org> 
> Cc: "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org> 
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster and public/private LAN
> 
> >I've built gluster systems that did the internal stuff over an IB network
> >and did the external stuff over 10G..
> >
> >I didn't even think about it and it just worked.
> >
> >On Dec 18, 2012, at 11:26 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> >
> >> I have an idea I'd like to run past everyone. Every gluster peer would
> >>have two NICs - one "public" and the other "private" with different IP
> >>subnets. The idea that I am proposing would be to have every gluster
> >>peer have all private peer addresses in /etc/hosts, but the public
> >>addresses would be in DNS. Clients would use DNS.
> >> 
> >> The goal is to have all peer-to-peer communication (self-heal,
> >>rebalance, etc) happen on the private network, leaving all the bandwidth
> >>on the public network available for client connections.
> >> 
> >> Will this work on 3.3.1 or newer? If the volume information that
> >>gluster clients and servers pass to each other only has hostnames, I
> >>would expect it to work. Of course I would have the usual scalability
> >>problems associated with relying in part on /etc/hosts, but knowing that
> >>in advance, we can take the proper precautions.
> >> 
> >> Side note: the public and private NICs would each actually be a bonded
> >>pair and plugged into separate switches for network redundancy.
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shawn
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gluster-users mailing list
> >> Gluster-users at gluster.org 
> >> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users 
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Gluster-users mailing list
> >Gluster-users at gluster.org
> >http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
> 
> 
> NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information of NetSuite Inc. and is for the sole use of the intended recipient for the stated purpose. Any improper use or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender; do not review, copy or distribute; and promptly delete or destroy all transmitted information. Please note that all communications and information transmitted through this email system may be monitored by NetSuite or its agents and that all incoming email is automatically scanned by a third party spam and filtering service.





More information about the Gluster-users mailing list