[Gluster-users] Optimal XFS formatting?

Sabuj Pattanayek sabujp at gmail.com
Thu Oct 20 15:29:45 UTC 2011

> The issues with both random-access performance and fsck times vary a lot
> according to *exactly* which version of each you're using.  I'm in the same

Yup, our tests recently were done directly to XFS using bonnie,
iozone, fio, and tiobench on centos6, which is not using the most
bleeding edge version of XFS by default. We're still using gluster
3.0.x so many of those benchmarking programs blow up just trying to

More information about the Gluster-users mailing list