[Gluster-users] Improving test cases QA / gluster 3.2.0 - totally broken?
jburnash at knight.com
Thu May 19 14:50:30 UTC 2011
Excellent point, and fabulous constructive idea. I'll certainly participate.
From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Andre Felipe Machado
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 10:35 AM
To: gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Improving test cases QA / gluster 3.2.0 - totally broken?
It seems that QA test cases are somewhat different than real world deployments by the users at this list.
It may be more productive to have wiki pages where we, the users, describe with very much enough details (config files, hardware and network, workload profiles,
etc) how we are using glusterfs.
Then, the QA Team will have a good starting point to write their performance scripts and regression tests, for example.
Likely, some users will help running these scripts and regression tests over their hardware and network, collecting logs helping to improve stability and reliability.
How would these wiki pages be organized?
Could the QA Team create a skeleton of wiki pages tree to organize how we will write our deployment info and workload profiles in a format useful for them?
The stability and reliability issues are the blocking factors for a government size deployment we are evaluating. Performance for small files (1k to 20k) are "the second level" issue. But this affects alternatives too.
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please immediately notify me and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
NOTICE REGARDING PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY Knight Capital Group may, at its discretion, monitor and review the content of all e-mail communications. http://www.knight.com
More information about the Gluster-users