[Gluster-users] gluster 3.2.0 - totally broken?

[Burnash, James]

I believe that it is more consistent and repeatable to just use the gluster command to set this. Example from this page: http://www.gluster.com/community/documentation/index.php/Gluster_3.1:_Setting_Volume_Options

gluster volume set VOLNAME performance.io-thread-count 64

This also means that your changes will persist across any other "gluster volume set" commands. Generally speaking, hand editing the volume config files is a bad idea, IMHO.

James

-----Original Message-----
From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Justice London
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:49 PM
To: 'Tomasz Chmielewski'; 'Anthony J. Biacco'
Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster 3.2.0 - totally broken?

Whoops, and forgot the threads edit for the brick instance config:

volume <volname>-io-threads
    type performance/io-threads
    option thread-count 64
    subvolumes <volname>-locks
end-volume

Justice London
Systems Administrator

phone 800-397-3743 ext. 7005
fax 760-510-0299
web www.lawinfo.com
e-mail jlondon at lawinfo.com

PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system.

-----Original Message-----
From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org
[mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Tomasz Chmielewski
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 10:05 AM
To: Anthony J. Biacco
Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] gluster 3.2.0 - totally broken?

On 18.05.2011 18:56, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
> I'm using it in real-world production, lot of small files (apache 
> webroot mounts mostly). I've seen a bunch of split-brain and self-heal 
> failing when I first did the switch. After I removed and recreated the 
> dirs it seemed to be fine for about a week now; yeah not long, I know.
>
> I 2^nd the notion that it'd be nice to see a list of what files/dirs 
> gluster thinks is out of sync or can't heal. Right now you gotta go 
> diving into the logs.
>
> I'm actually thinking of downgrading to 3.1.3 from 3.2.0. Wonder if 
> I'd have any ill-effects on the volume with a simple rpm downgrade and 
> daemon restart.

I've been using 3.2.0 for a while, but I had a problem with userspace programs "hanging" on accessing some files on the gluster mount (described here on the list).

I downgraded to 3.1.4 (remove 3.2.0 rpm and config, install 3.1.4 rpm, add nodes) and it works fine for me.

3.0.x was also crashing for me when SSHFS-like mount was used to the server with gluster mount (and reads/writes were made from the gluster mount through it).



--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users at gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users at gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


DISCLAIMER: 
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please immediately notify me and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. 
NOTICE REGARDING PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY Knight Capital Group may, at its discretion, monitor and review the content of all e-mail communications. http://www.knight.com