[Gluster-users] Setup for production - which one would you choose?

[Oliver Hoffmann]

lol, and we have nothing to do with the cathedral or Dom Koelsch either.
But having DomUs on glusterfs would be nice though, if possible.

Greetings,

Oliver

> off topic .. 
> 
> Just happened to look at your website, in the hope it had something
> to do with virtualization ( DomU :-) ). Like the way the Management
> and Strategy tab is done :-) .. pretty creative ( a little slow to
> pop up though .. ).
> 
> Regards,
> Tejas.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Oliver Hoffmann" <oh at dom.de>
> To: gluster-users at gluster.org
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 11:29:25 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata,
> Mumbai, New Delhi Subject: [Gluster-users] Setup for production -
> which one would you choose?
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I just made some tests on two old machines using Ubuntu 10.4 (server
> i386) with fuse-2.7.4glfs11 and glusterfs-3.0.3. At a first glance it
> seems to be OK. 
> The next step is deploying a system which could be used for
> production. What would you suggest? Ubuntu 10.4 (server 64bit) is my
> first choice because of LTS. Whatsoever, I think it is more the
> version of glusterfs which makes it stable or not, isn't it?
> In the end I'd like to have a distributed & replicated storage which
> provides data for a bunch of (virtualized) LAMPS.
> 
> TIA for your recommendations!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Oliver Hoffmann
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>