[Gluster-users] Quickread Translator Memory Leak?
Benjamin Long
benjamin.long at longbros.com
Thu Mar 18 19:30:50 UTC 2010
On Thursday 18 March 2010 03:03:03 pm Vijay Bellur wrote:
> Benjamin Long wrote:
> > Has anyone else noticed a memory leak when using the Quickread
> > translator?
>
> Quickread translator does unlimited caching as of now. This is not a
> memory leak but it has the same effect in exhausting available memory.
> We are going to improve this behavior through enhancement bug 723.
>
> > My workstations are having a problem as well. After running for a few
> > days (as long as a week) the users start having their sessions killed.
> > They are returned to a login prompt, and can login again. Glusterfs is
> > still running at this point, but I think thats because all the users apps
> > were first on the kill list for an oom condition. The backup server runs
> > nothing but glusterfs and rsync.
>
> Do you have details of GlusterFS's memory usage (Resident Memory and
> percentage of memory used) at the instant when the oom condition was
> observed?
>
>
> Regards,
> Vijay
>
Yep. It's a VM with 1GB of ram. It runs nothing but gluster, rsync, and ssh. I
saw glusterfs using 97% of the ram just before it died. All the swap was used
up too.
Here's the output of top about 10 min before that:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2868 root 20 0 55664 2356 648 S 14 0.2 0:23.28 rsync
2239 root 20 0 933m 752m 1300 R 5 74.9 0:12.06 glusterfs
I can turn quickread back on and test some more if it will be helpful.
--
Benjamin Long
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list