shehjart at gluster.com
Tue Sep 15 05:24:51 UTC 2009
David Saez Padros wrote:
>> In the long run, we'd really prefer applications using booster
>> since that avoids the need to use the custom libglusterfsclient
>> API. Just slip booster under an app and it works. However, the
>> disadvantage is that booster does not at this time support all
>> the system calls an application might need. For a full list, see:
> I supoose that simple applications like cp, mv, rm & mkdir are
> fully supported, is that right ?
I hope so. ;)
I cant comment on such general tools because all our testing focus
wrt booster has been on unfs3 and apache, both of which work.
Do try these out for us if convenient. We'd really like bug reports
about extending booster to support them.
More information about the Gluster-users