[Gluster-users] gfs vs nfs: abysmal performance difference
Paolo Pisati
paolo.pisati at tomato.it
Mon May 11 14:28:10 UTC 2009
Paolo Pisati wrote:
> Dear,
>
> we are evaluating Glusterfs as an alternative to NFS. I connected two
> boxes (a dell 2950 and a via epia)
> with a crossover cable: the via epia is the gfs server, the 2950 is the
> client, and both run freebsd 7.2.
>
i forgot to say that i'm running glusterfs-2.0.0, and that my setup is:
client:
LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib -liconv
CFLAGS=-O -I/usr/local/include/
./configure -enable-fuse-client --prefix=/usr/local/gfs
[snip]
GlusterFS configure summary
===========================
FUSE client : yes
Infiniband verbs : no
epoll IO multiplex : no
Berkeley-DB : no
libglusterfsclient : no
mod_glusterfs : no ()
argp-standalone : yes
server:
CFLAGS=-O
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/gfs
[snip]
GlusterFS configure summary
===========================
FUSE client : no
Infiniband verbs : no
epoll IO multiplex : no
Berkeley-DB : no
libglusterfsclient : no
mod_glusterfs : no ()
argp-standalone : yes
--
Paolo Pisati
Reparto Sistemi
---------
ContactLab
Via Natale Battaglia, 10
20127 Milano (Italy)
Tel. +39 02 28 31 181
Fax +39 02 70 03 02 69.
http://www.contactlab.com
More information about the Gluster-users
mailing list