[Gluster-users] Question re 2-server Mirrored setup
vikas at gluster.com
Tue Jul 28 08:20:51 UTC 2009
----- "Andy Sy" <andy.sy at neotitans.com> wrote:
> In the sample config for a 2-server mirror setup at:
> both volumes are considered remote and use
> tcp as transport-type. If you intend to use
> a local volume as one of the 2 servers in a
> mirrored setup, is there any advantage in defining
> glusterfs.vol as below?
There'll be a slight performance advantage since
it will avoid the local (loopback) network latency.
Engineer - http://gluster.com/
More information about the Gluster-users