mm at yuhu.biz
Fri Nov 14 19:13:37 UTC 2008
On Thursday 13 November 2008 20:43:10 Keith Freedman wrote:
> At 04:54 AM 11/13/2008, KwangErn Liew wrote:
> >2008/11/7 Rash <rash at konto.pl>
, 07 lis 2008, 15:35:48 +0530, Anand Avati napisaÅ(a):
> > > Most of us use 2.7.3glfs10
> >Is this module only or library or both?
> >Am guessin' it's both.
> >Am afraid that FUSE can be the culprit for
> >potential bugs in GlusterFS. It'd be best if
> >there's a recommended and standardised use of a particular FUSE version.
> I believe he was telling you that 2.7.3glfs10 is
> the recommended and standardised FUSE version.
> you can download it form gluster's website.
> I'd prefer gluster work with the latest version
> that's distributed with the operating systems.
> but gluster doesn't seem to play well with fuse 2.7.4 which I see as a
> problem. the dev's need to start testing with the latest
> version of FUSE, because presumably it fixes bugs
> that are present in 2.7.3 and possibly has other enhancements.
> locking us into an older version , even if it's "optimized" isn't a good
I'll try to produce a patch for 2.7.4 by the end of the week.
More information about the Gluster-users