[Gluster-infra] Please welcome Worker Ant
amye at redhat.com
Tue Aug 23 00:17:49 UTC 2016
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:16:15AM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > Le lundi 22 août 2016 à 12:41 +0530, Nigel Babu a écrit :
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've just switched the bugzilla authentication on Gerrit today. From
> > > onwards, Gerrit will comment on Bugzilla using a new account:
> > >
> > > bugzilla-bot at gluster.org
> > >
> > > If you notice any issues, please file a bug against
> > > This bot will only comment on public bugs, so if you open a review
> request when
> > > the bug is private, it will fail. This is intended behavior.
> > You got me curious, in which case are private bugs required ?
> > Do we need to make sure that the review is private also or something ?
> I do not expect any private bugs. On occasion it happens that a bug gets
> cloned from Red Hat Gluster Storage and it can contain customer details.
> Sometimes those bugs are not cleaned during the cloning (BAD!) and keep
> the references to details from customers.
> All bugs that we have in the GlusterFS product in bugzilla must be
> public, and must have a public description of the reported problem.
> Gluster-infra mailing list
> Gluster-infra at gluster.org
Is it worth denying all posts from RHGS and causing people to manually
I realize that's using a hammer on an edge-case, but if someone is moving a
bug to the gluster.org project, I feel like it's on them to scrub it.
Amye Scavarda | amye at redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gluster-infra