[Gluster-infra] Please welcome Worker Ant

[Amye Scavarda]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:16:15AM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> > Le lundi 22 août 2016 à 12:41 +0530, Nigel Babu a écrit :
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've just switched the bugzilla authentication on Gerrit today. From
> today
> > > onwards, Gerrit will comment on Bugzilla using a new account:
> > >
> > > bugzilla-bot at gluster.org
> > >
> > > If you notice any issues, please file a bug against
> project-infrastructure.
> > > This bot will only comment on public bugs, so if you open a review
> request when
> > > the bug is private, it will fail. This is intended behavior.
> >
> > You got me curious, in which case are private bugs required ?
> >
> > Do we need to make sure that the review is private also or something ?
>
> I do not expect any private bugs. On occasion it happens that a bug gets
> cloned from Red Hat Gluster Storage and it can contain customer details.
> Sometimes those bugs are not cleaned during the cloning (BAD!) and keep
> the references to details from customers.
>
> All bugs that we have in the GlusterFS product in bugzilla must be
> public, and must have a public description of the reported problem.
>
> Niels
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-infra mailing list
> Gluster-infra at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
>

Is it worth denying all posts from RHGS and causing people to manually
submit bugs?
I realize that's using a hammer on an edge-case, but if someone is moving a
bug to the gluster.org project, I feel like it's on them to scrub it.
-- amye


-- 
Amye Scavarda | amye at redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-infra/attachments/20160822/47895de1/attachment.html>