[Gluster-infra] License page is wrong on the web site
hchiramm at redhat.com
Wed Sep 17 10:41:48 UTC 2014
On 09/17/2014 03:26 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 17/09/2014, at 10:54 AM, Humble Chirammal wrote:
>> Isnt it better to have component name "infrastructure" than "website"?, so that
>> we can track all the infrastructure issues under the same component ?
>> just a thought here.
> Not a bad idea. "website" is probably clearer / more-obvious for external
> people reporting bugs though.
> Maybe we need two components. "website" and "project-infrastructure" ;)
I think its better to have 2 components as mentioned above, Ccing
gluster-infra on both.
More information about the Gluster-infra