[Gluster-infra] License page is wrong on the web site

[Niels de Vos]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:07:53AM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 17/09/2014, at 11:03 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:56:32AM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
> >> On 17/09/2014, at 10:54 AM, Humble Chirammal wrote:
> >> <snip>
> >>> Isnt it better to have component name "infrastructure" than "website"?, so that 
> >>> we can track all the infrastructure issues under the same component ?
> >>> 
> >>> just a thought here.
> >> 
> >> Not a bad idea.  "website" is probably clearer / more-obvious for external
> >> people reporting bugs though.
> >> 
> >> Maybe we need two components.  "website" and "project-infrastructure" ;)
> > 
> > Or a component 'infrastructure' with an optional sub-component
> > 'website', and maybe additional sub-components when something needs a
> > special bucket?
> 
> 
> Kinda doubting a new reporter is going to find subcomponents of an
> infrastructure component. ;)

Yeah, thats the general issue with sub-components IMHO.