[Gluster-devel] Regression health for release-5.next and release-6
Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan
atumball at redhat.com
Thu Jan 10 11:56:37 UTC 2019
That is a good point Mohit, but do we know how many of these tests failed
because of 'timeout' ? If most of these are due to timeout, then yes, it
may be a valid point.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 4:51 PM Mohit Agrawal <moagrawa at redhat.com> wrote:
> I think we should consider regression-builds after merged the patch (
> as we know this patch introduced some delay.
> Mohit Agrawal
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:55 PM Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
>> Mohit, Sanju - request you to investigate the failures related to
>> glusterd and brick-mux and report back to the list.
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:25 AM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>
>>> As part of branching preparation next week for release-6, please find
>>> test failures and respective test links here .
>>> The top tests that are failing/dumping-core are as below and need
>>> - ec/bug-1236065.t
>>> - glusterd/add-brick-and-validate-replicated-volume-options.t
>>> - readdir-ahead/bug-1390050.t
>>> - glusterd/brick-mux-validation.t
>>> - bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t
>>> Others of interest,
>>> - replicate/bug-1341650.t
>>> Please file a bug if needed against the test case and report the same
>>> here, in case a problem is already addressed, then do send back the
>>> patch details that addresses this issue as a response to this mail.
>>>  Regression failures: https://hackmd.io/wsPgKjfJRWCP8ixHnYGqcA?view
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gluster-devel