[Gluster-devel] [RFC] alter inode table lock from mutex to rwlock

Changwei Ge chge at linux.alibaba.com
Fri Aug 23 02:02:06 UTC 2019


Hi Amar,

Thanks for your reply, I will try it out then.


     -Changwei


On 2019/8/22 8:48 下午, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote:
> Hi Changwei Ge,
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 5:57 PM Changwei Ge <chge at linux.alibaba.com 
> <mailto:chge at linux.alibaba.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     Now inode_table_t:lock is type of mutex which I think we can use
>     ‘pthread_rwlock' to replace it for a better concurrency.
>
>     Because phread_rwlock allows more than one thread accessing inode
>     table
>     at the same time.
>     Moreover, the critical section the lock is protecting won't take many
>     CPU cycles and no I/O and CPU fault/exception involved after a quick
>     glance at glusterfs code.
>     I hope I didn't miss something.
>     If I would get an ACK from major glusterfs developer, I will try
>     to do it.
>
>
> You are right. I believe this is possible. No harm in trying this out.
>
> Xavier, Raghavendra, Pranith, Nithya, do you think this is possible?
>
> Regards,
>
>     Thanks.
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Community Meeting Calendar:
>
>     APAC Schedule -
>     Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
>     Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/836554017
>
>     NA/EMEA Schedule -
>     Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT
>     Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/486278655
>
>     Gluster-devel mailing list
>     Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>     https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
>
> -- 
> Amar Tumballi (amarts)


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list