[Gluster-devel] [RFC] alter inode table lock from mutex to rwlock
Changwei Ge
chge at linux.alibaba.com
Fri Aug 23 02:02:06 UTC 2019
Hi Amar,
Thanks for your reply, I will try it out then.
-Changwei
On 2019/8/22 8:48 下午, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote:
> Hi Changwei Ge,
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 5:57 PM Changwei Ge <chge at linux.alibaba.com
> <mailto:chge at linux.alibaba.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Now inode_table_t:lock is type of mutex which I think we can use
> ‘pthread_rwlock' to replace it for a better concurrency.
>
> Because phread_rwlock allows more than one thread accessing inode
> table
> at the same time.
> Moreover, the critical section the lock is protecting won't take many
> CPU cycles and no I/O and CPU fault/exception involved after a quick
> glance at glusterfs code.
> I hope I didn't miss something.
> If I would get an ACK from major glusterfs developer, I will try
> to do it.
>
>
> You are right. I believe this is possible. No harm in trying this out.
>
> Xavier, Raghavendra, Pranith, Nithya, do you think this is possible?
>
> Regards,
>
> Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
>
> Community Meeting Calendar:
>
> APAC Schedule -
> Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
> Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/836554017
>
> NA/EMEA Schedule -
> Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT
> Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/486278655
>
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Amar Tumballi (amarts)
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list