[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] One more way to contact Gluster team - Slack (gluster.slack.com)
Kaleb Keithley
kkeithle at redhat.com
Fri Apr 26 12:57:43 UTC 2019
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 8:21 AM Harold Miller <harold at redhat.com> wrote:
> Has Red Hat security cleared the Slack systems for confidential / customer
> information?
>
> If not, it will make it difficult for support to collect/answer questions.
>
I'm pretty sure Amar meant as a replacement for the freenode #gluster and
#gluster-dev channels, given that he sent this to the public gluster
mailing lists @gluster.org. Nobody should have even been posting
confidential and/or customer information to any of those lists or channels.
And AFAIK nobody ever has.
Amar, would you like to clarify which IRC channels you meant?
> Harold Miller, Associate Manager,
> Red Hat, Enterprise Cloud Support
> Desk - US (650) 254-4346
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:00 AM Scott Worthington <
> scott.c.worthington at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello, are you not _BOTH_ Red Hat FTEs or contractors?
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019, 3:16 AM Michael Scherer <mscherer at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Le vendredi 26 avril 2019 à 13:24 +0530, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan a
>>> écrit :
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > We wanted to move to Slack from IRC for our official communication
>>> > channel
>>> > from sometime, but couldn't as we didn't had a proper URL for us to
>>> > register. 'gluster' was taken and we didn't knew who had it
>>> > registered.
>>> > Thanks to constant ask from Satish, Slack team has now agreed to let
>>> > us use
>>> > https://gluster.slack.com and I am happy to invite you all there.
>>> > (Use this
>>> > link
>>> > <
>>> >
>>> https://join.slack.com/t/gluster/shared_invite/enQtNjIxMTA1MTk3MDE1LWIzZWZjNzhkYWEwNDdiZWRiOTczMTc4ZjdiY2JiMTc3MDE5YmEyZTRkNzg0MWJiMWM3OGEyMDU2MmYzMTViYTA
>>> > >
>>> > to
>>> > join)
>>> >
>>> > Please note that, it won't be a replacement for mailing list. But can
>>> > be
>>> > used by all developers and users for quick communication. Also note
>>> > that,
>>> > no information there would be 'stored' beyond 10k lines as we are
>>> > using the
>>> > free version of Slack.
>>>
>>> Aren't we concerned about the ToS of slack ? Last time I did read them,
>>> they were quite scary (like, if you use your corporate email, you
>>> engage your employer, and that wasn't the worst part).
>>>
>>> Also, to anticipate the question, my employer Legal department told me
>>> to not setup a bridge between IRC and slack, due to the said ToS.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Scherer
>>> Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-users mailing list
>>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-users mailing list
>> Gluster-users at gluster.org
>> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
>
> --
>
> HAROLD MILLER
>
> ASSOCIATE MANAGER, ENTERPRISE CLOUD SUPPORT
>
> Red Hat
>
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> Harold at RedHat.com T: (650)-254-4346
> <https://red.ht/sig>
> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20190426/7c1699ed/attachment.html>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list