[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)
atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 6 00:54:54 UTC 2018
On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 06:09, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay <
sankarshan.mukhopadhyay at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 5:17 AM, Amye Scavarda <amye at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 3:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >> On 07/31/2018 07:16 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> >> > On 07/30/2018 03:21 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> >> >> On 07/24/2018 03:12 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> >> >>> 1) master branch health checks (weekly, till branching)
> >> >>> - Expect every Monday a status update on various tests runs
> >> >> See https://build.gluster.org/job/nightly-master/ for a report on
> >> >> various nightly and periodic jobs on master.
> >> > Thinking aloud, we may have to stop merges to master to get these test
> >> > failures addressed at the earliest and to continue maintaining them
> >> > GREEN for the health of the branch.
> >> >
> >> > I would give the above a week, before we lockdown the branch to fix
> >> > failures.
> >> >
> >> > Let's try and get line-coverage and nightly regression tests addressed
> >> > this week (leaving mux-regression open), and if addressed not lock the
> >> > branch down.
> >> >
> >> Health on master as of the last nightly run  is still the same.
> >> Potential patches that rectify the situation (as in ) are bunched in
> >> a patch  that Atin and myself have put through several regressions
> >> (mux, normal and line coverage) and these have also not passed.
> >> Till we rectify the situation we are locking down master branch commit
> >> rights to the following people, Amar, Atin, Shyam, Vijay.
> >> The intention is to stabilize master and not add more patches that my
> >> destabilize it.
> >> Test cases that are tracked as failures and need action are present here
> >> .
> >> @Nigel, request you to apply the commit rights change as you see this
> >> mail and let the list know regarding the same as well.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shyam
> >>  Patches that address regression failures:
> >> https://review.gluster.org/#/q/starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com
> >>  Bunched up patch against which regressions were run:
> >> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/20637
> >>  Failing tests list:
> >>  Nightly run dashboard:
> > Locking master is fine, this seems like there's been ample notice and
> > conversation.
> > Do we have test criteria to indicate when we're unlocking master? X
> > of tests passing, Y amount of bugs?
> The "till we rectify" might just include 3 days of the entire set of
> tests passing - thinking out loud here.
3 days = 3 nightly regressions isn’t enough as most failures are spurious
in nature (IMHO). What Shyam and I are doing is retriggering various
regressions on top of patch  . We’re looking for atleast 10 iterations
to go through with out any tests retry and failures.
> sankarshan mukhopadhyay
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Gluster-devel