[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

Amye Scavarda amye at redhat.com
Sun Aug 5 23:47:37 UTC 2018


On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 3:24 PM Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 07/31/2018 07:16 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > On 07/30/2018 03:21 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> >> On 07/24/2018 03:12 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> >>> 1) master branch health checks (weekly, till branching)
> >>>   - Expect every Monday a status update on various tests runs
> >> See https://build.gluster.org/job/nightly-master/ for a report on
> >> various nightly and periodic jobs on master.
> > Thinking aloud, we may have to stop merges to master to get these test
> > failures addressed at the earliest and to continue maintaining them
> > GREEN for the health of the branch.
> >
> > I would give the above a week, before we lockdown the branch to fix the
> > failures.
> >
> > Let's try and get line-coverage and nightly regression tests addressed
> > this week (leaving mux-regression open), and if addressed not lock the
> > branch down.
> >
>
> Health on master as of the last nightly run [4] is still the same.
>
> Potential patches that rectify the situation (as in [1]) are bunched in
> a patch [2] that Atin and myself have put through several regressions
> (mux, normal and line coverage) and these have also not passed.
>
> Till we rectify the situation we are locking down master branch commit
> rights to the following people, Amar, Atin, Shyam, Vijay.
>
> The intention is to stabilize master and not add more patches that my
> destabilize it.
>
> Test cases that are tracked as failures and need action are present here
> [3].
>
> @Nigel, request you to apply the commit rights change as you see this
> mail and let the list know regarding the same as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
> [1] Patches that address regression failures:
> https://review.gluster.org/#/q/starredby:srangana%2540redhat.com
>
> [2] Bunched up patch against which regressions were run:
> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/20637
>
> [3] Failing tests list:
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IF9GhpKah4bto19RQLr0y_Kkw26E_-crKALHSaSjZMQ/edit?usp=sharing
>
> [4] Nightly run dashboard: https://build.gluster.org/job/nightly-master/
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers at gluster.org
> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>

Locking master is fine, this seems like there's been ample notice and
conversation.
Do we have test criteria to indicate when we're unlocking master? X amount
of tests passing, Y amount of bugs?
- amye

-- 
Amye Scavarda | amye at redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20180805/d652afff/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list