[Gluster-devel] trash.t failure

[Atin Mukherjee]

On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 at 10:43, Nigel Babu <nigelb at redhat.com> wrote:

> I've reverted the original patch entirely. Our policy is to either mark
> the test as bad or revert the entire patch. This seems to have caused
> multiple failures in the test system, so I've reverted the entire patch.
> Please re-land the patch with any fixes as a fresh review.
>

Thanks Nigel.

The patches waiting on the regression queue need to be rebased. Only doing
a ‘recheck centos’ is not going to be helpful.


>
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> commit d206fab73f6815c927a84171ee9361c9b31557b1
>> Author: Kinglong Mee <mijinlong at open-fs.com>
>> Date:   Mon Apr 9 08:33:51 2018 -0400
>>
>>     storage/posix: add pgfid in readdirp if needed
>>
>>     Change-Id: I6745428fd9d4e402bf2cad52cee8ab46b7fd822f
>>     fixes: bz#1560319
>>     Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <mijinlong at open-fs.com>
>>
>>
>> The above commit has caused (thanks to Amar for bisect!) trash.t test in
>> upstream CI to fail very frequently. As per fstat.gluster.org (refer :
>> https://bit.ly/2qGcSP6) this test has failed 17 times in master branch
>> in last 4 days. Given we're nearing GlusterFS 4.1 branching and there're
>> few important patches blocked in the regression pipeline queue, I've sent a
>> patch https://review.gluster.org/19894  to mark trash.t as bad for now
>> as a temporary arrangement.
>>
>> I request Kinglong and the owner of trash feature to debug this issue and
>> send a fix which can revert back my change.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> nigelb
>
-- 
- Atin (atinm)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20180418/192e760d/attachment.html>