[Gluster-devel] Change #18681 has broken build on master

Raghavendra G raghavendra at gluster.com
Wed Nov 8 03:15:18 UTC 2017


On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Nigel Babu <nigelb at redhat.com> wrote:

> Landed:https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/commit/
> c3d7974e2be68f0fac8f54c9557d0f868e6be6c8
>
> Please rebase your patches and re-trigger.
>

Thanks Nigel. I am wondering how did the build for #18681 succeed? Any
insights on this?


> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Nigel Babu <nigelb at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Rafi has a fix[1]. I'm going to make it skip regressions and land it
>> directly.
>>
>> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18680/
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Please check [1].
>>>
>>> Build on master branch on my laptop failed too:
>>>
>>> [raghu at unused server]$ make > /dev/null
>>> server.c: In function 'init':
>>> server.c:1205:9: error: too few arguments to function
>>> 'rpcsvc_program_register'
>>> In file included from server.h:17:0,
>>>                  from server.c:16:
>>> ../../../../rpc/rpc-lib/src/rpcsvc.h:426:1: note: declared here
>>> make[1]: *** [server.lo] Error 1
>>> make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>>
>>> The change was introduced by [2]. However, the puzzling thing is [2]
>>> itself was built successfully and has passed all tests. Wondering how did
>>> that happen.
>>>
>>> [1] https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/7281/console
>>> [2] review.gluster.org/18681
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Raghavendra
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> nigelb
>>
>
>
>
> --
> nigelb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Raghavendra G
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20171108/7b56d497/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list