[Gluster-devel] Coverity fixes
Kaleb S. KEITHLEY
kkeithle at redhat.com
Fri Nov 3 13:01:09 UTC 2017
On 11/02/2017 10:19 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> While I appreciate the folks to contribute lot of coverity fixes over
> last few days, I have an observation for some of the patches the
> coverity issue id(s) are *not* mentioned which gets maintainers in a
> difficult situation to understand the exact complaint coming out of the
> coverity. From my past experience in fixing coverity defects, sometimes
> the fixes might look simple but they are not.
> May I request all the developers to include the defect id in the commit
> message for all the coverity fixes?
How does that work? AFAIK the defect IDs are constantly changing as some
get fixed and new ones get added.
(And I know everyone looks at the coverity report after their new code
is committed to see if they might have added a new issue.)
Today's defect ID 435 might be 436 or 421 tomorrow.
More information about the Gluster-devel