[Gluster-devel] Release 3.11: RC1 is tagged!

Amar Tumballi atumball at redhat.com
Wed May 24 16:21:27 UTC 2017


On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Shyam <srangana at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 05/24/2017 02:05 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote:
>
>> Was looking at Milestone in Github:
>> https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%
>> 3Aissue+milestone%3A%22Release+3.11+%28STM%29%22
>>
>> It is still showing many things as open. I see some of them are done for
>> sure. Please feel free to mark them as 'Closed'. Ideal to have commit id
>> (from git log) while closing.
>>
>
> This is intentional Amar. The idea being once we have delivered all pieces
> we can mark if as closed.
>
> All pieces are design+code+documentation, IOW commits for gluster-specs,
> glusterfs, and release notes/glusterdocs commits.
>
> Once we have that in place, we can close the issue (even prior to the
> actual release). If not post the final release, I will cleanup the items in
> the lane as appropriate.
>
> Thoughts?
>

Thanks for clarifying. I was thinking of PR / patch having 'fixes #NNN',
which means automatically an issue would be closed. Hence the question.

Makes sense to keep it open if there is a piece pending from the feature,
no issues there, rather that is the proper way.

+1.

Regards,
Amar

>
>
>> -Amar
>>
>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Shyam <srangana at redhat.com
>> <mailto:srangana at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 05/23/2017 09:27 AM, Shyam wrote:
>>
>>         A note on release notes:
>>
>>         1) release-notes are a part of the code repository, hence use
>>         gerrit to
>>         submit your changes to the release notes
>>
>>
>>     Here is an example: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17372/
>>     <https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17372/>
>>
>>
>>         2) Also, as we use github for features, and most content that
>>         would be
>>         submitted to the release notes would be for features, use the
>>         same issue
>>         # as the code submission to submit the release notes changes as
>>         well.
>>
>>         For example, to submit release notes for "Enhance handleops
>>         readdirplus
>>         operation to return handles along with dirents", use "Updates:
>>         #174" in
>>         the release notes commit message. There is *no* *need* for a BUG
>>
>>         The advantages of this are that, we can track all submissions
>>         for said
>>         feature from the same issue in github (all submissions refers to
>>         feature-spec, code, release-notes, documentation changes).
>>
>>
>>     Here is how it gets reflected in the issue:
>>     https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/174#issuecomment
>> -303403925
>>     <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/174#issuecommen
>> t-303403925>
>>
>>
>>
>>         3) If a release-note is being added for a non-feature (say a
>> warning
>>         about some feature, or that some functionality is still
>>         experimental,
>>         IOW things that do not have github issues), then use a bug for the
>>         submission as before.
>>
>>         Thanks,
>>         Shyam
>>
>>         "Releases are made better together"
>>
>>         On 05/22/2017 09:37 PM, Shyam wrote:
>>
>>             Hi,
>>
>>             We just finished tagging release 3.11.0 RC1, that contains a
>>             few more
>>             fixes post 3.11.0 RC0.
>>
>>             Packages for the same will be made available soon.
>>
>>             *Attention* contributors:
>>               - We still are to see any updates to the release-notes
>>             [2], we have a
>>             week before the release, please update the release notes
>>             appropriately
>>
>>             *Attention* all:
>>               - Any pending bugs that are critical to the release need
>>             to be marked
>>             as a blocker against [1] and we have about a week left to
>>             close out
>>             these bugs!
>>
>>             Thanks,
>>             Shyam
>>
>>             [1] Tracker BZ for 3.11.0 blockers:
>>             https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.0
>>             <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.11.0
>> >
>>
>>             [2] Release notes:
>>             https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.11/doc/
>> release-notes/3.11.0.md
>>             <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/release-3.11/doc/
>> release-notes/3.11.0.md>
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             Gluster-devel mailing list
>>             Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>>             http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>             <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Gluster-devel mailing list
>>     Gluster-devel at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>>     http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>     <http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Amar Tumballi (amarts)
>>
>


-- 
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170524/945adb7d/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list