[Gluster-devel] Release 3.11: Backports needed and regression failure status

Hari Gowtham hgowtham at redhat.com
Tue May 23 07:06:09 UTC 2017


Hi,

the backport for https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17175/ is at
https://review.gluster.org/17364.

Regards,
Hari.

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Shyam <srangana at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Backport status:
> The following patches are available in release-3.10 but not in
> release-3.11,
>     - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17197/ (@nithya request the backport)
>     - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17175/ (@hari request the backport)
>
> Test case status (from fstat):
>
> Following test case was marked bad in master, but not in 3.11 and has
> caused a few aborted runs, I have backported the change, so we should be
> good in the future,
>   - tests/features/lock_revocation.t (backport:
> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17360/ )
>
> Request that any test case when marked bad in master, be looked at for the
> prior release (in this case 3.11) so that spurious regression failures are
> avoided in that branch as well.
>
> Following test cases failed 1 time in the last 3 weeks, so nothing
> critical, but reporting it here nevertheless,
> - ./tests/basic/afr/add-brick-self-heal.t
> - ./tests/basic/tier/legacy-many.t
> - ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-1345727-bricks-stop-on-no-quorum-validation.t
>
> Thanks,
> Shyam
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170523/f58fc9ce/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list