[Gluster-devel] Glusto failures with dispersed volumes + Samba

[Nigel Babu]

I've retried it more than a couple of times and the failures are consistent.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Ashish Pandey <aspandey at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nigel,
>>
>> As Pranith has already mentioned, we are getting different gfid's in loc
>> and loc->inode.
>> It looks like issue with DHT. If a re validate fails for gfid, a fresh
>> look up should be done.
>>
>> I don't know if it is related or not but a similar bug was fixed by
>> Pranith
>> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16986/
>>
>> Ashish
>>
>>
> Thanks for this info Ashish & Pranith. Also thanks for looking into this
> Anoop.
>
> Nigel, lets retry these things, and see if its still the case! if not
> great, but if it is, then I will help you sort this out!
>
> Regards,
> Amar
>
>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>
>> *To: *"Anoop C S" <anoopcs at autistici.org>
>> *Cc: *"gluster-devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
>> *Sent: *Thursday, June 29, 2017 7:36:45 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusto failures with dispersed volumes +
>> Samba
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Anoop C S <anoopcs at autistici.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 16:35 +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
>>> > Hi Pranith and Xavi,
>>> >
>>> > We seem to be running into a problem with glusto tests when we try to
>>> run them against dispersed
>>> > volumes over a CIFS mount[1].
>>>
>>> Is this a new test case? If not was it running successfully before?
>>>
>>> > You can find the logs attached to the job [2].
>>>
>>> VFS stat call failures are seen in Samba logs:
>>>
>>> [2017/06/29 11:01:55.959374,  0] ../source3/modules/vfs_gluster
>>> fs.c:870(vfs_gluster_stat)
>>>   glfs_stat(.) failed: Invalid argument
>>>
>>> I could also see the following errors(repeatedly..) in glusterfs client
>>> logs:
>>>
>>> [2017-06-29 10:33:43.031198] W [MSGID: 122019]
>>> [ec-helpers.c:412:ec_loc_gfid_check] 0-
>>> testvol_distributed-dispersed-disperse-0: Mismatching GFID's in loc
>>> [2017-06-29 10:33:43.031303] I [MSGID: 109094]
>>> [dht-common.c:1016:dht_revalidate_cbk] 0-
>>> testvol_distributed-dispersed-dht: Revalidate: subvolume
>>> testvol_distributed-dispersed-disperse-0
>>> for /user11 (gfid = 665c515b-3940-480f-af7c-6aaf37731eaa) returned -1
>>> [Invalid argument]
>>>
>>
>> This log basically says that EC received loc which has different gfids in
>> loc->inode->gfid and loc->gfid.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> > I've triggered a fresh job[3] to confirm that it only fails in these
>>> particular conditions and
>>> > certainly seems to be the case. The job is currently ongoing, so you
>>> may want to take a look when
>>> > you get some time how this job went.
>>> >
>>> > Let me know if you have any questions or need more debugging
>>> information.
>>> >
>>> > [1]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusto/325/testReport/
>>> > [2]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusto/325/artifact/
>>> > [3]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusto/326/console
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pranith
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Amar Tumballi (amarts)
>



-- 
nigelb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170717/e1838537/attachment.html>