[Gluster-devel] Glusto failures with dispersed volumes + Samba

Amar Tumballi atumball at redhat.com
Wed Jul 5 12:56:57 UTC 2017


On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Ashish Pandey <aspandey at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Nigel,
>
> As Pranith has already mentioned, we are getting different gfid's in loc
> and loc->inode.
> It looks like issue with DHT. If a re validate fails for gfid, a fresh
> look up should be done.
>
> I don't know if it is related or not but a similar bug was fixed by
> Pranith
> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/16986/
>
> Ashish
>
>
Thanks for this info Ashish & Pranith. Also thanks for looking into this
Anoop.

Nigel, lets retry these things, and see if its still the case! if not
great, but if it is, then I will help you sort this out!

Regards,
Amar


>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com>
> *To: *"Anoop C S" <anoopcs at autistici.org>
> *Cc: *"gluster-devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
> *Sent: *Thursday, June 29, 2017 7:36:45 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Gluster-devel] Glusto failures with dispersed volumes +
> Samba
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Anoop C S <anoopcs at autistici.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 16:35 +0530, Nigel Babu wrote:
>> > Hi Pranith and Xavi,
>> >
>> > We seem to be running into a problem with glusto tests when we try to
>> run them against dispersed
>> > volumes over a CIFS mount[1].
>>
>> Is this a new test case? If not was it running successfully before?
>>
>> > You can find the logs attached to the job [2].
>>
>> VFS stat call failures are seen in Samba logs:
>>
>> [2017/06/29 11:01:55.959374,  0] ../source3/modules/vfs_
>> glusterfs.c:870(vfs_gluster_stat)
>>   glfs_stat(.) failed: Invalid argument
>>
>> I could also see the following errors(repeatedly..) in glusterfs client
>> logs:
>>
>> [2017-06-29 10:33:43.031198] W [MSGID: 122019]
>> [ec-helpers.c:412:ec_loc_gfid_check] 0-
>> testvol_distributed-dispersed-disperse-0: Mismatching GFID's in loc
>> [2017-06-29 10:33:43.031303] I [MSGID: 109094] [dht-common.c:1016:dht_revalidate_cbk]
>> 0-
>> testvol_distributed-dispersed-dht: Revalidate: subvolume
>> testvol_distributed-dispersed-disperse-0
>> for /user11 (gfid = 665c515b-3940-480f-af7c-6aaf37731eaa) returned -1
>> [Invalid argument]
>>
>
> This log basically says that EC received loc which has different gfids in
> loc->inode->gfid and loc->gfid.
>
>
>>
>> > I've triggered a fresh job[3] to confirm that it only fails in these
>> particular conditions and
>> > certainly seems to be the case. The job is currently ongoing, so you
>> may want to take a look when
>> > you get some time how this job went.
>> >
>> > Let me know if you have any questions or need more debugging
>> information.
>> >
>> > [1]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusto/325/testReport/
>> > [2]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusto/325/artifact/
>> > [3]: https://ci.centos.org/job/gluster_glusto/326/console
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Gluster-devel mailing list
>> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pranith
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Amar Tumballi (amarts)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170705/ecdc50a3/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list