[Gluster-devel] Invitation: Re: Question on merging zfs snapshot supp... @ Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:30pm - 3:30pm (IST) (sriram at marirs.net.in)
sriram at marirs.net.in
sriram at marirs.net.in
Fri Jan 13 04:01:28 UTC 2017
Hi Avra,
Thank you.
Sriram
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017, at 12:40 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> Works fine for us Sriram. Friday 2-3 pm.
>
> Regards,
> Avra
>
> On 01/12/2017 11:54 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>> Hi Avra,
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply, could we have the meeting tomorrow? 2-3 pm?
>>
>> Sriram
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We can have a discussion tomorrow i.e 12th January from 3pm to 4 pm.
>>> Does that time work for you?
>>>
>>> Meeting Link : https://bluejeans.com/u/asengupt/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Avra
>>>
>>> On 01/10/2017 09:35 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>> Hello Rajesh, Avra,
>>>>
>>>> Could we have a discussion on the below? This week sometime?
>>>>
>>>> Sriram
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017, at 04:56 PM, Rajesh Joseph wrote:
>>>>> Sure, will setup it from next week onward.
>>>>> -Rajesh
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:38 PM, <sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rajesh,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Right now bi-weekly should be ok, with progress we could decide.
>>>>>> I'll continue to rework the initial patch set and post it for
>>>>>> review. We'll take it from there, is that ok with you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017, at 03:32 PM, Rajesh Joseph wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 3:19 PM, <sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Avra,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is the below request ok with you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016, at 10:00 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Avra/Rajesh,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In continuation to the discussion we'd yesterday, I'd be
>>>>>>>>> working on the change we'd initiated sometime back for
>>>>>>>>> pluggable FS specific snapshot implementation. We'd be moving
>>>>>>>>> our gluster deployements to "master" (stable) once this
>>>>>>>>> feature goes in. Since, glusterd2.0 release is scheduled
>>>>>>>>> release next year, I'd be happy if some of the work done here
>>>>>>>>> is re-usable to glusterd2.0 as well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let me know, if this is ok. Like Rajesh mentioned in the call,
>>>>>>>>> could we've a weekly meeting for the same feature?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>>>> I was on vacation so could not reply to your mail.
>>>>>>> I am OK with having a regular sync-up on this issue. Let's take
>>>>>>> this to conclusion.
>>>>>>> Do we need a weekly meeting or bi-weekly meeting is fine?
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>> Rajesh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016, at 03:55 PM, asengupt at redhat.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> more details »[1]
>>>>>>>>>> Re: [Gluster-devel] Question on merging zfs snapshot
>>>>>>>>>> support into the mainline glusterfs
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>>>>>>> Could you please join the hangout, so that we can discuss
>>>>>>>>>> snapshot plugabbility. Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> Meeting Link: https://bluejeans.com/u/asengupt/[2]
>>>>>>>>>> Regards, Avra
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/19/2016 01:38 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote: > Hi
>>>>>>>>>> Avra, > > Could you help on the below request? May I abandon
>>>>>>>>>> the previous submitted patches, and could we consider the
>>>>>>>>>> latest one? > > Sriram > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016, at 12:57
>>>>>>>>>> PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote: >> Hi Avra, >> >> Thanks for
>>>>>>>>>> the reply, >> >> But the problem I see here is the previous
>>>>>>>>>> patch set sent would'nt compile individually. So, I merged
>>>>>>>>>> the changes into a single patch , which i'd posted today. Is
>>>>>>>>>> it ok to drop all the previous posted patches and consider
>>>>>>>>>> from the new one? Please suggest. >> >> Sriram >> >> >> On
>>>>>>>>>> Thu, Dec 15, 2016, at 12:45 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: >>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>> Sriram, >>> >>> I have already provided comments on the new
>>>>>>>>>> patch. It seems this new patch while addressing merge
>>>>>>>>>> cloflicts, has undone some previous patches. I suggest you
>>>>>>>>>> send this patch on top of the previous patchset
>>>>>>>>>> (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15554/1[3]) instead of
>>>>>>>>>> creating a new one. This will allow you to view the diff
>>>>>>>>>> between the new version and the previous version, and will
>>>>>>>>>> give u an idea if the diff is something that you added in the
>>>>>>>>>> patch or got added as part of merge conflict. >>> >>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>> Avra >>> >>> On 12/15/2016 12:09 PM,
>>>>>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in wrote: >>>> Hi Avra, >>>> >>>> I've
>>>>>>>>>> update the patch according to the comments below. And created
>>>>>>>>>> a single patch which does the initial modularization. Fixed
>>>>>>>>>> the tab->space issue as well. I've raised a new review
>>>>>>>>>> request for the same bug ID here: >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/16138/[4] >>>> >>>> Added,
>>>>>>>>>> Rajesh and You as the reviewers, let me know if I need to do
>>>>>>>>>> anything else. >>>> >>>> Could you have a look and let me
>>>>>>>>>> know? >>>> >>>> (Sorry for the delay in creating this) >>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>> Sriram >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Avra
>>>>>>>>>> Sengupta wrote: >>>>> Hi Sriram, >>>>> >>>>> The point I was
>>>>>>>>>> trying to make is, that we want that each patch should
>>>>>>>>>> compile by itself, and pass regression. So for that to
>>>>>>>>>> happen, we need to consolidate these patches(the first three)
>>>>>>>>>> into one patch, and have the necessary make file changes into
>>>>>>>>>> that patch too. >>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15554/[5] >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15555/[6] >>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15556/[7] >>>>> >>>>> That will
>>>>>>>>>> give us one single patch, that contains the changes of having
>>>>>>>>>> the current code moved into separate files, and it should get
>>>>>>>>>> compiled on it's own, and should pass regression. Also, we
>>>>>>>>>> use spaces, and not tabs in the code. So we will need to get
>>>>>>>>>> those changed too. Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Avra
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 10/12/2016 10:46 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Avra, >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you let me know on
>>>>>>>>>> the below request? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sriram >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016, at 11:16 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Avra, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I checked the comment, the
>>>>>>>>>> series of patches, (There are nine patches) for which I've
>>>>>>>>>> posted for a review below. They've all the necessary
>>>>>>>>>> makefiles to compile. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would you want me to
>>>>>>>>>> consolidate all'em and post them as a single patch? (I
>>>>>>>>>> thought that would be a little confusing, since it'd changes
>>>>>>>>>> with different intentions). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sriram >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016, at 03:54 PM, Avra
>>>>>>>>>> Sengupta wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Sriram, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> posted a comment into the first patch. It doesn't compile by
>>>>>>>>>> itself. We need to update the respective makefiles to be able
>>>>>>>>>> to compile it. Then we can introduce the tabular structure in
>>>>>>>>>> the same patch to have the framework set for the zfs
>>>>>>>>>> snapshots. Thanks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Avra
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 09/30/2016 10:24 AM,
>>>>>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Avra, >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Could you have a look into the below request?
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sriram >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On
>>>>>>>>>> Fri, Sep 23, 2016, at 04:10 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Avra, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have submitted the
>>>>>>>>>> patches for Modularizing snapshot, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377437[8]
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is the patch set: >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15554[9] This patch
>>>>>>>>>> follows the discussion from the gluster-devel mail chain of,
>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15555[10] Referring
>>>>>>>>>> to bugID:1377437, Modularizing snapshot for plugin based
>>>>>>>>>> modules. >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15556[11] -
>>>>>>>>>> This is third patch in the series for the bug=1377437
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15557[12]
>>>>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch4]: Refering to the bug ID, >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15558[13] [BugId:1377437][Patch5]:
>>>>>>>>>> Refering to the bug ID, >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15559[14] [BugId:1377437][Patch6]:
>>>>>>>>>> Refering to the bug ID, >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/1556[15] [BugId:1377437][Patch7]:
>>>>>>>>>> Refering to the bug ID. * This patch has some minor ...
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15561[16]
>>>>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch8]: Refering to the bug ID, this commit
>>>>>>>>>> has minor fixes ... >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15562[17] [BugId:1377437][Patch9]:
>>>>>>>>>> Refering to the bug ID, - Minor header file ... >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Primarily, focused on moving lvm based
>>>>>>>>>> implementation into plugins. Have spread the commits across
>>>>>>>>>> nine patches, some of them are minors, except a couple of
>>>>>>>>>> ones which does the real work. Others are minors. Followed
>>>>>>>>>> this method since, it would be easy for a review
>>>>>>>>>> (accept/reject). Let me know if there is something off the
>>>>>>>>>> methods followed with gluster devel. Thanks >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sriram >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016,
>>>>>>>>>> at 10:58 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have created a bug for this
>>>>>>>>>> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377437[18]).
>>>>>>>>>> The plan is that for the first patch as mentioned below,
>>>>>>>>>> let's not meddle with the zfs code at all. What we are
>>>>>>>>>> looking at is segregating the lvm based code as is today,
>>>>>>>>>> from the management infrastructure (which is addressed in
>>>>>>>>>> your patch), and creating a table based pluggable infra(refer
>>>>>>>>>> to gd_svc_cli_actors[] in xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-
>>>>>>>>>> handler.c and other similar tables in gluster code base to
>>>>>>>>>> get a understanding of what I am conveying), which can be
>>>>>>>>>> used to call this code and still achieve the same results as
>>>>>>>>>> we do today. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Once this code is
>>>>>>>>>> merged, we can use the same infra to start pushing in the zfs
>>>>>>>>>> code (rest of your current patch). Please let me know if you
>>>>>>>>>> have further queries regarding this. Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Avra >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 09/19/2016 07:52 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Avra, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a
>>>>>>>>>> bug id for this changes? Or may I raise a new one?
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sriram >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, at 11:37 AM,
>>>>>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Avra,
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll send this patch to gluster
>>>>>>>>>> master in a while. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 14,
>>>>>>>>>> 2016, at 03:08 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>> Sriram, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay in
>>>>>>>>>> response. I started going through the commits in the github
>>>>>>>>>> repo. I finished going through the first commit, where you
>>>>>>>>>> create a plugin structure and move code. Following is the
>>>>>>>>>> commit link: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/sriramster/glusterfs/commit/7bf157525539541ebf0aa36a380bbedb2cae5440[19]
>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FIrst of all, the overall
>>>>>>>>>> approach of using plugins, and maintaining plugins that is
>>>>>>>>>> used in the patch is in sync with what we had discussed.
>>>>>>>>>> There are some gaps though, like in the zfs functions the
>>>>>>>>>> snap brick is mounted without updating labels, and in restore
>>>>>>>>>> you perform a zfs rollback, which significantly changes the
>>>>>>>>>> behavior between how a lvm based snapshot and a zfs based
>>>>>>>>>> snapshot. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But before we get
>>>>>>>>>> into these details, I would request you to kindly send this
>>>>>>>>>> particular patch to the g
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *When* Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:30pm – 3:30pm India Standard Time
>>>>>>>>>> *Calendar*
>>>>>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>>>>>> *Who*
>>>>>>>>>> •
>>>>>>>>>> asengupt at redhat.com - organizer
>>>>>>>>>> •
>>>>>>>>>> rjoseph at redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>> •
>>>>>>>>>> ram at fractalio.com
>>>>>>>>>> •
>>>>>>>>>> gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>>> •
>>>>>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>>>>>> Going? *Yes[20] - Maybe - No[21]* more options »[22]
>>>>>>>>>> Invitation from Google Calendar[23]
>>>>>>>>>> You are receiving this courtesy email at the account
>>>>>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in because you are an attendee of this
>>>>>>>>>> event.
>>>>>>>>>> To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this
>>>>>>>>>> event. Alternatively you can sign up for a Google account at
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/calendar/ and control your
>>>>>>>>>> notification settings for your entire calendar.
>>>>>>>>>> Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to
>>>>>>>>>> modify your RSVP response. Learn More[24].
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Email had 2 attachments:
>>>>>>>>>> * Attachment1.3 10k (text/calendar)
>>>>>>>>>> * invite.ics 14k (application/ics)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Links:
1. https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en
2. https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbluejeans.com%2Fu%2Fasengupt%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHgp0xCwA9DqgdbAc9s2OxthUEHRA
3. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15554%2F1&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNE4gL3TlKKImxMOU_yOKoCFnP27BA
4. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F16138%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGST3yFW0o5r4X5DiUXR0GOvgUUUQ
5. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15554%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEgad6GCmPU7P8S1wod8fgs-vOJLw
6. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15555%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNG6W-AdS5f66QUqkj1ywoxXGes7NQ
7. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15556%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNG_1vMwB5YePfBQSG0lhYUTxoAM3w
8. https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.redhat.com%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D1377437&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNFg-7VmX5CLxzVmud3uCFN8S8CDoA
9. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15554&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHk_z5vu62VRSnxCltQhL-8H7w5-w
10. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15555&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNFtjkyj_R7NYpRk-tnP3ol4tpthYQ
11. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15556&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEi_WhUMxIIYJe2LZ6b43yFJtO9YA
12. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15557&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNH7GHU6yX6hZrloWQOovx3sRni2pQ
13. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15558&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEdvqKP6ZkiNzBS6PG0V4yXPPe2Mg
14. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15559&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEapBOtXvqFtGb5va2ZzWgtD2BFIQ
15. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15560&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHs2bZyIlC78giiYEi-4q2-PA6IMw
16. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15561&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGFuuYDikEfaccqIiQ_Bo-amMC1Jw
17. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15562&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGH9R8bTbHfGsVvL9R-1m41gGHGRg
18. https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.redhat.com%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D1377437&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNFg-7VmX5CLxzVmud3uCFN8S8CDoA
19. https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsriramster%2Fglusterfs%2Fcommit%2F7bf157525539541ebf0aa36a380bbedb2cae5440&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEo6QDZCzyg9yMQ4mqkY0zM6Z9krg
20. https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&rst=1&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en
21. https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&rst=2&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en
22. https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en
23. https://www.google.com/calendar/
24. https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170113/2d023e0b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list