[Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Requesting patch to be considered for 3.10 release

[Atin Mukherjee]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Samikshan Bairagya <sbairagy at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 01/09/2017 10:33 AM, Shyam wrote:
>>
>>> I am considering this as tentatively accepted for 3.10 release for the
>>> following reasons,
>>>   - It is part of user feedback received during discussion of a related
>>> and targeted feature for 3.10 [1]
>>>   - Feature is useful and enhancement as analyzed by the glusterd team
>>> is relevant
>>>   - Code is ready and partly reviewed
>>>
>>> It is tentative, so that in case others have objections in changing the
>>> 3.10 scope to add this, we can consider hear them out. I would hence
>>> wait for a couple of days before merging this into master before
>>> branching for 3.10. (say till Jan 11th, 2017)
>>>
>>> Issue for this is already created here [2], could you accelerate adding
>>> a feature page for the same?
>>>
>>
>> The feature page for the same can be found here:
>> http://review.gluster.org/16359/
>
>
> spec change has got my ack, however given I don't have merge rights on the
> spec, would request Kaushal/Shyam to get this in. Also the patch
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/16303/ has been acked with +2.
>

spec change is now merged, thank Pai! I'll be merging the other change
request by today EOD, if you have any objections please raise it early.


>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Samikshan
>>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shyam
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/56
>>> [2] https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/79
>>>
>>> On 01/06/2017 05:29 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
>>>
>>>> This would definitely be a great addition looking at the past  user
>>>> requests and bugs. I already have acked the patch and awaiting Pranith's
>>>> review.
>>>>
>>>> @Samikshan - Can we file a github issue for the same (with a spec) and
>>>> then if it's approved we can put it in release-3.10 lane?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Samikshan Bairagya <sbairagy at redhat.com
>>>> <mailto:sbairagy at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     This patch, http://review.gluster.org/#/c/16303/
>>>>     <http://review.gluster.org/#/c/16303/> adds details on maximum
>>>>     supported op-version for clients to the volume status <VOLNAME|all>
>>>>     output. This might be a useful change to have as part of the
>>>>     upcoming 3.10 release and I would like to request the respective
>>>>     maintainers to consider the same.
>>>>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409078
>>>>     <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409078> is the
>>>>     corresponding BZ for this change.
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks and Regards,
>>>>
>>>>     Samikshan
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     maintainers mailing list
>>>>     maintainers at gluster.org <mailto:maintainers at gluster.org>
>>>>     http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>>>>     <http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> ~ Atin (atinm)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ~ Atin (atinm)
>



-- 

~ Atin (atinm)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170112/b64286f5/attachment.html>