[Gluster-devel] Invitation: Re: Question on merging zfs snapshot supp... @ Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:30pm - 3:30pm (IST) (sriram at marirs.net.in)
sriram at marirs.net.in
sriram at marirs.net.in
Tue Jan 10 16:05:41 UTC 2017
Hello Rajesh, Avra,
Could we have a discussion on the below? This week sometime?
Sriram
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017, at 04:56 PM, Rajesh Joseph wrote:
> Sure, will setup it from next week onward.
> -Rajesh
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:38 PM, <sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote:
>> __
>> Hi Rajesh,
>>
>> Right now bi-weekly should be ok, with progress we could decide. I'll
>> continue to rework the initial patch set and post it for review.
>> We'll take it from there, is that ok with you?
>>
>> Sriram
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017, at 03:32 PM, Rajesh Joseph wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 3:19 PM, <sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote:
>>>> __
>>>> Hi Avra,
>>>>
>>>> Is the below request ok with you?
>>>>
>>>> Sriram
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016, at 10:00 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>>> Hi Avra/Rajesh,
>>>>>
>>>>> In continuation to the discussion we'd yesterday, I'd be working
>>>>> on the change we'd initiated sometime back for pluggable FS
>>>>> specific snapshot implementation. We'd be moving our gluster
>>>>> deployements to "master" (stable) once this feature goes in.
>>>>> Since, glusterd2.0 release is scheduled release next year, I'd be
>>>>> happy if some of the work done here is re-usable to glusterd2.0 as
>>>>> well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know, if this is ok. Like Rajesh mentioned in the call,
>>>>> could we've a weekly meeting for the same feature?
>>>
>>> Hi Sriram,
>>> I was on vacation so could not reply to your mail.
>>> I am OK with having a regular sync-up on this issue. Let's take this
>>> to conclusion.
>>> Do we need a weekly meeting or bi-weekly meeting is fine?
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Rajesh
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016, at 03:55 PM, asengupt at redhat.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> more details »[1]
>>>>>> Re: [Gluster-devel] Question on merging zfs snapshot support into
>>>>>> the mainline glusterfs
>>>>>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>>> Could you please join the hangout, so that we can discuss
>>>>>> snapshot plugabbility. Thanks
>>>>>> Meeting Link: https://bluejeans.com/u/asengupt/[2]
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Avra
>>>>>> On 12/19/2016 01:38 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi Avra,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Could you help on the below request? May I abandon the
>>>>>> > previous submitted patches, and could we consider the latest
>>>>>> > one?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Sriram
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016, at 12:57 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>>>> >> Hi Avra,
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Thanks for the reply,
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> But the problem I see here is the previous patch set sent
>>>>>> >> would'nt compile individually. So, I merged the changes into a
>>>>>> >> single patch , which i'd posted today. Is it ok to drop all
>>>>>> >> the previous posted patches and consider from the new one?
>>>>>> >> Please suggest.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Sriram
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016, at 12:45 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
>>>>>> >>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> I have already provided comments on the new patch. It seems
>>>>>> >>> this new patch while addressing merge cloflicts, has undone
>>>>>> >>> some previous patches. I suggest you send this patch on top
>>>>>> >>> of the previous patchset
>>>>>> >>> (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15554/1[3]) instead of
>>>>>> >>> creating a new one. This will allow you to view the diff
>>>>>> >>> between the new version and the previous version, and will
>>>>>> >>> give u an idea if the diff is something that you added in the
>>>>>> >>> patch or got added as part of merge conflict.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Regards, Avra
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> On 12/15/2016 12:09 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>>>> >>>> Hi Avra,
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> I've update the patch according to the comments below. And
>>>>>> >>>> created a single patch which does the initial
>>>>>> >>>> modularization. Fixed the tab->space issue as well. I've
>>>>>> >>>> raised a new review request for the same bug ID here:
>>>>>> >>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/16138/[4]
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> Added, Rajesh and You as the reviewers, let me know if I
>>>>>> >>>> need to do anything else.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> Could you have a look and let me know?
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> (Sorry for the delay in creating this)
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> Sriram
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> The point I was trying to make is, that we want that each
>>>>>> >>>>> patch should compile by itself, and pass regression. So for
>>>>>> >>>>> that to happen, we need to consolidate these patches(the
>>>>>> >>>>> first three) into one patch, and have the necessary make
>>>>>> >>>>> file changes into that patch too.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15554/[5]
>>>>>> >>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15555/[6]
>>>>>> >>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15556/[7]
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> That will give us one single patch, that contains the
>>>>>> >>>>> changes of having the current code moved into separate
>>>>>> >>>>> files, and it should get compiled on it's own, and should
>>>>>> >>>>> pass regression. Also, we use spaces, and not tabs in the
>>>>>> >>>>> code. So we will need to get those changed too. Thanks.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> Regards, Avra
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> On 10/12/2016 10:46 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Avra,
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> Could you let me know on the below request?
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016, at 11:16 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>> >>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Avra,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> I checked the comment, the series of patches, (There are
>>>>>> >>>>>>> nine patches) for which I've posted for a review below.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> They've all the necessary makefiles to compile.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would you want me to consolidate all'em and post them as
>>>>>> >>>>>>> a single patch? (I thought that would be a little
>>>>>> >>>>>>> confusing, since it'd changes with different intentions).
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016, at 03:54 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I posted a comment into the first patch. It doesn't
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> compile by itself. We need to update the respective
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> makefiles to be able to compile it. Then we can
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> introduce the tabular structure in the same patch to
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> have the framework set for the zfs snapshots. Thanks.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, Avra
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 09/30/2016 10:24 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Avra,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Could you have a look into the below request?
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016, at 04:10 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Avra,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have submitted the patches for Modularizing snapshot,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377437[8]
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is the patch set:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15554[9] This patch follows
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the discussion from the gluster-devel mail chain of,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ... http://review.gluster.org/15555[10] Referring to
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> bugID:1377437, Modularizing snapshot for plugin based
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> modules. http://review.gluster.org/15556[11] - This is
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> third patch in the series for the bug=1377437
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15557[12]
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch4]: Refering to the bug ID,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15558[13]
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch5]: Refering to the bug ID,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15559[14]
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch6]: Refering to the bug ID,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/1556[15]
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch7]: Refering to the bug ID. *
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This patch has some minor ...
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15561[16]
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch8]: Refering to the bug ID, this
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> commit has minor fixes ...
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15562[17]
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [BugId:1377437][Patch9]: Refering to the bug ID, -
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Minor header file ...
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Primarily, focused on moving lvm based implementation
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> into plugins. Have spread the commits across nine
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> patches, some of them are minors, except a couple of
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ones which does the real work. Others are minors.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Followed this method since, it would be easy for a
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> review (accept/reject). Let me know if there is
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> something off the methods followed with gluster devel.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016, at 10:58 PM, Avra Sengupta
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have created a bug for this
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377437[18])
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> . The plan is that for the first patch as mentioned
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> below, let's not meddle with the zfs code at all.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What we are looking at is segregating the lvm based
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> code as is today, from the management infrastructure
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (which is addressed in your patch), and creating a
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> table based pluggable infra(refer to
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> gd_svc_cli_actors[] in xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> handler.c and other similar tables in gluster code
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> base to get a understanding of what I am conveying),
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> which can be used to call this code and still achieve
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> the same results as we do today.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Once this code is merged, we can use the same infra
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> to start pushing in the zfs code (rest of your
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> current patch). Please let me know if you have
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> further queries regarding this. Thanks.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, Avra
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 09/19/2016 07:52 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Avra,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a bug id for this changes? Or may I
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> raise a new one?
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, at 11:37 AM,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Avra,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll send this patch to gluster master in a while.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sriram
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016, at 03:08 PM, Avra Sengupta
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sriram,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay in response. I started going
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> through the commits in the github repo. I finished
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> going through the first commit, where you create a
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugin structure and move code. Following is the
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit link:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/sriramster/glusterfs/commit/7bf157525539541ebf0aa36a380bbedb2cae5440[19]
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FIrst of all, the overall approach of using
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> plugins, and maintaining plugins that is used in
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the patch is in sync with what we had discussed.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are some gaps though, like in the zfs
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> functions the snap brick is mounted without
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> updating labels, and in restore you perform a zfs
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rollback, which significantly changes the behavior
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> between how a lvm based snapshot and a zfs based
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshot.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But before we get into these details, I would
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> request you to kindly send this particular patch
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the g
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *When* Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:30pm – 3:30pm India Standard Time
>>>>>> *Calendar*
>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>> *Who*
>>>>>> •
>>>>>> asengupt at redhat.com - organizer
>>>>>> •
>>>>>> rjoseph at redhat.com
>>>>>> •
>>>>>> ram at fractalio.com
>>>>>> •
>>>>>> gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>>> •
>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in
>>>>>> Going? *Yes[20] - Maybe[21] - No[22]* more options »[23]
>>>>>> Invitation from Google Calendar[24]
>>>>>> You are receiving this courtesy email at the account
>>>>>> sriram at marirs.net.in because you are an attendee of this event.
>>>>>> To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this
>>>>>> event. Alternatively you can sign up for a Google account at
>>>>>> https://www.google.com/calendar/ and control your notification
>>>>>> settings for your entire calendar.
>>>>>> Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to modify
>>>>>> your RSVP response. Learn More[25].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Email had 2 attachments:
>>>>>> * Attachment1.3 10k (text/calendar)
>>>>>> * invite.ics 14k (application/ics)
>>>>>
>>>>> _________________________________________________
>>>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>>>
>>
Links:
1. https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en
2. https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbluejeans.com%2Fu%2Fasengupt%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHgp0xCwA9DqgdbAc9s2OxthUEHRA
3. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15554%2F1&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNE4gL3TlKKImxMOU_yOKoCFnP27BA
4. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F16138%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGST3yFW0o5r4X5DiUXR0GOvgUUUQ
5. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15554%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEgad6GCmPU7P8S1wod8fgs-vOJLw
6. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15555%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNG6W-AdS5f66QUqkj1ywoxXGes7NQ
7. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15556%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNG_1vMwB5YePfBQSG0lhYUTxoAM3w
8. https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.redhat.com%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D1377437&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNFg-7VmX5CLxzVmud3uCFN8S8CDoA
9. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15554&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHk_z5vu62VRSnxCltQhL-8H7w5-w
10. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15555&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNFtjkyj_R7NYpRk-tnP3ol4tpthYQ
11. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15556&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEi_WhUMxIIYJe2LZ6b43yFJtO9YA
12. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15557&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNH7GHU6yX6hZrloWQOovx3sRni2pQ
13. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15558&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEdvqKP6ZkiNzBS6PG0V4yXPPe2Mg
14. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15559&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEapBOtXvqFtGb5va2ZzWgtD2BFIQ
15. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15560&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHs2bZyIlC78giiYEi-4q2-PA6IMw
16. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15561&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGFuuYDikEfaccqIiQ_Bo-amMC1Jw
17. https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15562&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGH9R8bTbHfGsVvL9R-1m41gGHGRg
18. https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.redhat.com%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D1377437&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNFg-7VmX5CLxzVmud3uCFN8S8CDoA
19. https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsriramster%2Fglusterfs%2Fcommit%2F7bf157525539541ebf0aa36a380bbedb2cae5440&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEo6QDZCzyg9yMQ4mqkY0zM6Z9krg
20. https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&rst=1&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en
21. https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&rst=3&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en
22. https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&rst=2&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en
23. https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en
24. https://www.google.com/calendar/
25. https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170110/9ad0dcc1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list