[Gluster-devel] Invitation: Re: Question on merging zfs snapshot supp... @ Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:30pm - 3:30pm (IST) (sriram at marirs.net.in)

Mon Jan 2 11:26:44 UTC 2017

Sure, will setup it from next week onward.

-Rajesh

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:38 PM, <sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote:

> Hi Rajesh,
>
> Right now bi-weekly should be ok, with progress we could decide. I'll
> continue to rework the initial patch set and post it for review. We'll take
> it from there, is that ok with you?
>
> Sriram
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017, at 03:32 PM, Rajesh Joseph wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 3:19 PM, <sriram at marirs.net.in> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Avra,
>
> Is the below request ok with you?
>
> Sriram
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016, at 10:00 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
>
> Hi Avra/Rajesh,
>
> In continuation to the discussion we'd yesterday, I'd be working on the
> change we'd initiated sometime back for pluggable FS specific snapshot
> implementation. We'd be moving our gluster deployements to "master"
> (stable) once this feature goes in. Since, glusterd2.0 release is scheduled
> release next year, I'd be happy if some of the work done here is re-usable
> to glusterd2.0 as well.
>
> Let me know, if this is ok. Like Rajesh mentioned in the call, could we've
> a weekly meeting for the same feature?
>
>
> Hi Sriram,
> I was on vacation so could not reply to your mail.
> I am OK with having a regular sync-up on this issue. Let's take this to
> conclusion.
> Do we need a weekly meeting or bi-weekly meeting is fine?
> Best Regards,
> Rajesh
>
>
>
>
>
> Sriram
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016, at 03:55 PM, asengupt at redhat.com wrote:
>
>
>
> more details »
> <https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en>
> Re: [Gluster-devel] Question on merging zfs snapshot support into the
> mainline glusterfs
> Hi Sriram,
>
> Could you please join the hangout, so that we can discuss snapshot
> plugabbility. Thanks
>
> Meeting Link: https://bluejeans.com/u/asengupt/
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbluejeans.com%2Fu%2Fasengupt%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHgp0xCwA9DqgdbAc9s2OxthUEHRA>
>
> Regards,
> Avra
>
> On 12/19/2016 01:38 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
> > Hi Avra,
> >
> > Could you help on the below request? May I abandon the previous
> submitted patches, and could we consider the latest one?
> >
> > Sriram
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016, at 12:57 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
> >> Hi Avra,
> >>
> >> Thanks for the reply,
> >>
> >> But the problem I see here is the previous patch set sent would'nt
> compile individually. So, I merged the changes into a single patch , which
> i'd posted today. Is it ok to drop all the previous posted patches and
> consider from the new one? Please suggest.
> >>
> >> Sriram
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016, at 12:45 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> >>> Hi Sriram,
> >>>
> >>> I have already provided comments on the new patch. It seems this new
> patch while addressing merge cloflicts, has undone some previous patches. I
> suggest you send this patch on top of the previous patchset(
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15554/1
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15554%2F1&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNE4gL3TlKKImxMOU_yOKoCFnP27BA>)
> instead of creating a new one. This will allow you to view the diff between
> the new version and the previous version, and will give u an idea if the
> diff is something that you added in the patch or got added as part of merge
> conflict.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Avra
> >>>
> >>> On 12/15/2016 12:09 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
> >>>> Hi Avra,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've update the patch according to the comments below. And created a
> single patch which does the initial modularization. Fixed the tab->space
> issue as well. I've raised a new review request for the same bug ID here:
> >>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/16138/
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F16138%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGST3yFW0o5r4X5DiUXR0GOvgUUUQ>
> >>>>
> >>>> Added, Rajesh and You as the reviewers, let me know if I need to do
> anything else.
> >>>>
> >>>> Could you have a look and let me know?
> >>>>
> >>>> (Sorry for the delay in creating this)
> >>>>
> >>>> Sriram
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Sriram,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The point I was trying to make is, that we want that each patch
> should compile by itself, and pass regression. So for that to happen, we
> need to consolidate these patches(the first three) into one patch, and have
> the necessary make file changes into that patch too.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15554/
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15554%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEgad6GCmPU7P8S1wod8fgs-vOJLw>
> >>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15555/
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15555%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNG6W-AdS5f66QUqkj1ywoxXGes7NQ>
> >>>>> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15556/
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F%23%2Fc%2F15556%2F&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNG_1vMwB5YePfBQSG0lhYUTxoAM3w>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That will give us one single patch, that contains the changes of
> having the current code moved into separate files, and it should get
> compiled on it's own, and should pass regression. Also, we use spaces, and
> not tabs in the code. So we will need to get those changed too. Thanks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Avra
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 10/12/2016 10:46 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Avra,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Could you let me know on the below request?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sriram
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016, at 11:16 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Avra,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I checked the comment, the series of patches, (There are nine
> patches) for which I've posted for a review below. They've all the
> necessary makefiles to compile.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Would you want me to consolidate all'em and post them as a single
> patch? (I thought that would be a little confusing, since it'd changes with
> different intentions).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sriram
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016, at 03:54 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hi Sriram,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I posted a comment into the first patch. It doesn't compile by
> itself. We need to update the respective makefiles to be able to compile
> it. Then we can introduce the tabular structure in the same patch to have
> the framework set for the zfs snapshots. Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>> Avra
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 09/30/2016 10:24 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Avra,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Could you have a look into the below request?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sriram
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016, at 04:10 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Avra,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Have submitted the patches for Modularizing snapshot,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377437
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.redhat.com%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D1377437&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNFg-7VmX5CLxzVmud3uCFN8S8CDoA>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> This is the patch set:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15554
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15554&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHk_z5vu62VRSnxCltQhL-8H7w5-w>
> This patch follows the discussion from the gluster-devel mail chain of, ...
> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15555
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15555&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNFtjkyj_R7NYpRk-tnP3ol4tpthYQ>
> Referring to bugID:1377437, Modularizing snapshot for plugin based modules.
> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15556
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15556&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEi_WhUMxIIYJe2LZ6b43yFJtO9YA>
> - This is third patch in the series for the bug=1377437
> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15557
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15557&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNH7GHU6yX6hZrloWQOovx3sRni2pQ>
> [BugId:1377437][Patch4]: Refering to the bug ID,
> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15558
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15558&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEdvqKP6ZkiNzBS6PG0V4yXPPe2Mg>
> [BugId:1377437][Patch5]: Refering to the bug ID,
> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15559
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15559&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEapBOtXvqFtGb5va2ZzWgtD2BFIQ>
> [BugId:1377437][Patch6]: Refering to the bug ID,
> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15560
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15560&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNHs2bZyIlC78giiYEi-4q2-PA6IMw>
> [BugId:1377437][Patch7]: Refering to the bug ID. * This patch has some
> minor ...
> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15561
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15561&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGFuuYDikEfaccqIiQ_Bo-amMC1Jw>
> [BugId:1377437][Patch8]: Refering to the bug ID, this commit has minor
> fixes ...
> >>>>>>>>>> http://review.gluster.org/15562
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Freview.gluster.org%2F15562&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNGH9R8bTbHfGsVvL9R-1m41gGHGRg>
> [BugId:1377437][Patch9]: Refering to the bug ID, - Minor header file ...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Primarily, focused on moving lvm based implementation into
> plugins. Have spread the commits across nine patches, some of them are
> minors, except a couple of ones which does the real work. Others are
> minors. Followed this method since, it would be easy for a review
> (accept/reject). Let me know if there is something off the methods followed
> with gluster devel. Thanks
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Sriram
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016, at 10:58 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sriram,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I have created a bug for this (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
> how_bug.cgi?id=1377437
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.redhat.com%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D1377437&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNFg-7VmX5CLxzVmud3uCFN8S8CDoA>).
> The plan is that for the first patch as mentioned below, let's not meddle
> with the zfs code at all. What we are looking at is segregating the lvm
> based code as is today, from the management infrastructure (which is
> addressed in your patch), and creating a table based pluggable infra(refer
> to gd_svc_cli_actors[] in xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-handler.c
> and other similar tables in gluster code base to get a understanding of
> what I am conveying), which can be used to call this code and still achieve
> the same results as we do today.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Once this code is merged, we can use the same infra to start
> pushing in the zfs code (rest of your current patch). Please let me know if
> you have further queries regarding this. Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Avra
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 09/19/2016 07:52 PM, sriram at marirs.net.in wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Avra,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a bug id for this changes? Or may I raise a new
> one?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sriram
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, at 11:37 AM, sriram at marirs.net.in
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Avra,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll send this patch to gluster master in a while.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sriram
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016, at 03:08 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sriram,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay in response. I started going through
> the commits in the github repo. I finished going through the first commit,
> where you create a plugin structure and move code. Following is the commit
> link:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/sriramster/
> glusterfs/commit/7bf157525539541ebf0aa36a380bbedb2cae5440
> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsriramster%2Fglusterfs%2Fcommit%2F7bf157525539541ebf0aa36a380bbedb2cae5440&sa=D&usd=2&usg=AFQjCNEo6QDZCzyg9yMQ4mqkY0zM6Z9krg>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FIrst of all, the overall approach of using plugins, and
> maintaining plugins that is used in the patch is in sync with what we had
> discussed. There are some gaps though, like in the zfs functions the snap
> brick is mounted without updating labels, and in restore you perform a zfs
> rollback, which significantly changes the behavior between how a lvm based
> snapshot and a zfs based snapshot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But before we get into these details, I would request you
> to kindly send this particular patch to the g
>
>
>
>
>
> *When*
> Tue Dec 20, 2016 2:30pm – 3:30pm India Standard Time
> *Calendar*
> sriram at marirs.net.in
> *Who*
> •
> asengupt at redhat.com - organizer
> •
> rjoseph at redhat.com
> •
> ram at fractalio.com
> •
> gluster-devel at gluster.org
> •
> sriram at marirs.net.in
>
> Going?   *Yes
> <https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&rst=1&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en>
> - Maybe
> <https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&rst=3&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en>
> - No
> <https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=RESPOND&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&rst=2&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en>*
>     more options »
> <https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&eid=YWJoMmtwNHAzc3EyNDgybTRjb2llaW1jNm8gc3JpcmFtQG1hcmlycy5uZXQuaW4&tok=MTkjYXNlbmd1cHRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbTYyNWZlYjFmYzg2NWRkNGI2YzAyY2FlYmVkMTIwM2VlZmMxZTY0Mzg&ctz=Asia/Calcutta&hl=en>
>
> Invitation from Google Calendar <https://www.google.com/calendar/>
>
> You are receiving this courtesy email at the account sriram at marirs.net.in
> because you are an attendee of this event.
>
> To stop receiving future updates for this event, decline this event.
> Alternatively you can sign up for a Google account at
> https://www.google.com/calendar/ and control your notification settings
> for your entire calendar.
>
> Forwarding this invitation could allow any recipient to modify your RSVP
> response. Learn More
> <https://support.google.com/calendar/answer/37135#forwarding>.
>
> Email had 2 attachments:
>
>    - Attachment1.3
>      10k (text/calendar)
>    - invite.ics
>      14k (application/ics)
>
>
> *_______________________________________________*
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170102/3213c336/attachment-0001.html>