[Gluster-devel] What is the answer to the 3.9.1 release question?

[Niels de Vos]

On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 10:00:56AM -0800, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> <top post>
> 
> I realize we're behind on this, but I'd like us to make sure we're all
> aligned on releasing good product. Can we say by EOD Tuesday, we're in
> agreement on what we're testing / what's not being tested?
> 
> I know that there's at least a bug or two that are outstanding for
> 3.9, and Vijay will need to weigh in on this as well.

Because 3.9 should get updates every month, isnt it good to get
something out that addresses at least some bugs? There does not seem
to be a 3.9.1 tracker, so I can not find any bugs that are marked as
absolute blockers for the update. A pointer to those bugs would be
welcome.

Thanks,
Niels


> 
> </top post>
> -- amye
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
> <pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote:
> > I am fine with it. Thanks Kaleb!!
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 01/06/2017 06:42 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle at redhat.com
> >> > <mailto:kkeithle at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >     Nothing?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The reason I asked for 2 maintainers for the release is so that there
> >> > will be load distribution. But unfortunately the pairing was bad, both
> >> > of us are impacted by the same work which is leading to not enough time
> >> > for upstream release maintenance. Last time I was loaded a bit less so
> >> > took care of most of the things at the end with help from Amye and
> >> > Vijay. But this time I am swamped with work too. Please suggest how we
> >> > can get the release out.
> >> >
> >> > May be Aravinda can add if he is a bit free to do this.
> >>
> >> I'd certainly be willing to step in and help. I don't have time either
> >> to do an extensive round of testing.
> >>
> >> I'm not convinced that an STM release update needs huge amounts of
> >> testing either. (But feel free to disagree with me. ;-))
> >>
> >> If you and Aravinda are okay with it, I'll do some minimal testing, tag,
> >> and release.
> >>
> >> Just so we can get _something_ out!?!  What do you think?
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Kaleb
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pranith
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Amye Scavarda | amye at redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20170109/cb1d3649/attachment.sig>