[Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

[Kaushal M]

As the majority seem to favour Prashanth's approach, I vote for it as well.

Just to make it clearer for all users, please add a **highlighted**
note in the README that informs any visitor to the github page of the
change.

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Raghavendra Talur <rtalur at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Aravinda <avishwan at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 for Prashanth's approach.
>
>
> +1
>>
>> regards
>> Aravinda
>>
>> On 05/18/2016 03:55 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal
>> <humble.devassy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> All in favor of the 'everyone working on this should clone again'
>> approach.
>>
>> Both approaches require cloning again, so which on are we voting for?
>>
>> 1. Prashanth's approach
>>     - modify existing repo
>>     - users re clone
>>     - push force to their forks on github
>>
>> 2. Misc's approach
>>   - create a new minified repo
>>   - users clone/fork the new repo
>>
>> I don't mind either.
>>
>> +2 on the same thought. :)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>