[Gluster-devel] Reducing the size of the glusterdocs git repository

Raghavendra Talur rtalur at redhat.com
Thu May 19 05:45:33 UTC 2016


On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Aravinda <avishwan at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1 for Prashanth's approach.
>

+1

> regards
> Aravinda
>
> On 05/18/2016 03:55 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal<humble.devassy at gmail.com> <humble.devassy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Amye Scavarda <amye at redhat.com> <amye at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>  All in favor of the 'everyone working on this should clone again'
> approach.
>
> Both approaches require cloning again, so which on are we voting for?
>
> 1. Prashanth's approach
>     - modify existing repo
>     - users re clone
>     - push force to their forks on github
>
> 2. Misc's approach
>   - create a new minified repo
>   - users clone/fork the new repo
>
> I don't mind either.
>
>
> +2 on the same thought. :)
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing listGluster-devel at gluster.orghttp://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing listGluster-devel at gluster.orghttp://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20160519/8ac90882/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list