[Gluster-devel] conflicting keys for option eager-lock

Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkarampu at redhat.com
Wed Apr 13 07:20:16 UTC 2016



On 04/13/2016 11:58 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>
>
> On 04/13/2016 09:15 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>> On 04/08/2016 10:25 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>>> Hey Pranith, Ashish -
>>>
>>> We have broken support for group virt after the following commit in
>>> release-3.7:
>>>
>>> commit 46920e3bd38d9ae7c1910d0bd83eff309ab20c66
>>> Author: Ashish Pandey <aspandey at redhat.com>
>>> Date:   Fri Mar 4 13:05:09 2016 +0530
>>>
>>>      cluster/ec: Provide an option to enable/disable eager lock
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thinking more - do we need two different options to control eager 
>> lock behavior for afr and ec? cluster.eager-lock can be applicable 
>> for ec too as ec and afr are normally used in a mutually exclusive 
>> manner. Are we resorting to a different key for glusterd's op-version 
>> compatibility?
>
> Tiering breaks all our assumptions, at the  moment we want afr to use 
> eager-lock where as disperse to not for tiering, so it is better this 
> way.

This is only till we fix the eager-locking behavior in disperse in some 
cases where it is not learning that other clients are competing for 
locks. We already have a solution in place. After which both can be 
enabled for things to work smooth.

Pranith
>
> Pranith
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vijay
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel



More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list