[Gluster-devel] conflicting keys for option eager-lock

Pranith Kumar Karampuri pkarampu at redhat.com
Wed Apr 13 06:28:17 UTC 2016



On 04/13/2016 09:15 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 10:25 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>> Hey Pranith, Ashish -
>>
>> We have broken support for group virt after the following commit in
>> release-3.7:
>>
>> commit 46920e3bd38d9ae7c1910d0bd83eff309ab20c66
>> Author: Ashish Pandey <aspandey at redhat.com>
>> Date:   Fri Mar 4 13:05:09 2016 +0530
>>
>>      cluster/ec: Provide an option to enable/disable eager lock
>>
>>
>
> Thinking more - do we need two different options to control eager lock 
> behavior for afr and ec? cluster.eager-lock can be applicable for ec 
> too as ec and afr are normally used in a mutually exclusive manner. 
> Are we resorting to a different key for glusterd's op-version 
> compatibility?

Tiering breaks all our assumptions, at the  moment we want afr to use 
eager-lock where as disperse to not for tiering, so it is better this way.

Pranith

>
> Thanks,
> Vijay



More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list