[Gluster-devel] [Regression-failure] glusterd status

[Atin Mukherjee]

On 26 May 2015 18:35, "Avra Sengupta" <asengupt at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What you are refering with the glusterd being restarted might be true,
but I don't remember if the two different peer addresses were before and
after restarting glusterd, or after restarting glusterd and before/after
peer status. We might need to re-do this exercise on a rackspace vm to get
more clarity.
I will encourage to do it before this patch gets into the codebase.
>
> Regards,
> Avra
>
>
> On 05/26/2015 06:26 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
>>
>> These are my findings regarding the issue KP mentioned with
>> volume-snapshot-clone.t.
>>
>>  From what I gathered, the double peerinfo objects issue was observed
>> only via logs. Additional logging was added to
>> glusterd_peer_rpc_notify to log the objects address and
>> peerinfo->hostname . I did the same and observed the same in my logs.
>> But what I found was that glusterd was being restarted in between the
>> logs with different address. So the peerinfo objects were bound to
>> have different addresses.
>>
>> Avra, can you confirm if the above is correct? In the case it is, then
>> I can help debug the issue being faced.
>>
>> I've been running the test on a local vm but, I've not gotten it to
>> fail, even without Avra's partial fix. I spoke to Atin regarding this,
>> and he informed me that the failures are only hit on the rackspace
>> slave VMs. I'll try get access to a slave VM and check the issue out.
>>
>> ~kaushal
>>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Krishnan Parthasarathi
>> <kparthas at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> The following are the regression test failures that are being looked
>>> at by Atin, Avra, Kaushal and self.
>>>
>>> 1) ./tests/bugs/glusterd/bug-974007.t   to be fixed by
http://review.gluster.org/10872
>>>
>>> 2) ./tests/basic/volume-snapshot-clone. to be fixed (partially) by
http://review.gluster.org/10895
>>>     There is another issue ('other' part) where there are 2 peerinfo
objects for a given peer/node. This
>>>     is being investigated by Kaushal.
>>>
>>> Will keep this thread updated as and when more progress is made.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> KP
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20150526/6342c81b/attachment-0001.html>