[Gluster-devel] Rebalance is not working in single node cluster environment.

Atin Mukherjee atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com
Sat Jun 13 08:57:20 UTC 2015


Sent from Samsung Galaxy S4
On 13 Jun 2015 13:15, "Raghavendra Talur" <raghavendra.talur at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Atin Mukherjee <
atin.mukherjee83 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sent from Samsung Galaxy S4
>> On 13 Jun 2015 12:58, "Anand Nekkunti" <anekkunt at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi All
>> >    Rebalance is not working in single node cluster environment (
current test frame work ).  I am getting error in below test , it seems
re-balance is not migrated to  current cluster test framework.
>> Could you pin point which test case fails and what log do you see?
>> >
>> > cleanup;
>> > TEST launch_cluster 2;
>> > TEST $CLI_1 peer probe $H2;
>> >
>> > EXPECT_WITHIN $PROBE_TIMEOUT 1 check_peers
>> >
>> > $CLI_1 volume create $V0 $H1:$B1/$V0  $H2:$B2/$V0
>> > EXPECT 'Created' volinfo_field $V0 'Status';
>> >
>> > $CLI_1 volume start $V0
>> > EXPECT 'Started' volinfo_field $V0 'Status';
>> >
>> > #Mount FUSE
>> > TEST glusterfs -s $H1 --volfile-id=$V0 $M0;
>> >
>> > TEST mkdir $M0/dir{1..4};
>> > TEST touch $M0/dir{1..4}/files{1..4};
>> >
>> > TEST $CLI_1 volume add-brick $V0 $H1:$B1/${V0}1 $H2:$B2/${V0}1
>> >
>> > TEST $CLI_1 volume rebalance $V0  start
>> >
>> > EXPECT_WITHIN 60 "completed" CLI_1_rebalance_status_field $V0
>> >
>> > $CLI_2 volume status $V0
>> > EXPECT 'Started' volinfo_field $V0 'Status';
>> >
>> > cleanup;
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Anand.N
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Gluster-devel mailing list
>> > Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gluster-devel mailing list
>> Gluster-devel at gluster.org
>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>>
>
> If it is a crash of glusterd when you do rebalance start, it is because
of FORTIFY_FAIL in libc.
> Here is the patch that Susant has already sent:
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11090/
>
> You can verify that it is the same crash by checking the core in gdb; a
SIGABRT would be raised
> after strncpy.
>
AFAIR Anand tried it in mainline and that fix was already in place.  I
think this is something different.
> --
> Raghavendra Talur
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20150613/402718f0/attachment.html>


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list