[Gluster-devel] Lazy umount emulation

[Emmanuel Dreyfus]

On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:21:59AM -0400, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
> Yeah, that should do. I don't think you need
> to go out of the way to support lazy umount functionality
> in *BSD, when it's not essential to the working of replace-brick
> and other commands that use lazy umount.

Here is my latest patch to fix replace-brick on NetBSD.
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8649/

Please review.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu at netbsd.org