[Gluster-devel] Lazy umount emulation
kparthas at redhat.com
Tue Sep 9 07:21:59 UTC 2014
Yeah, that should do. I don't think you need
to go out of the way to support lazy umount functionality
in *BSD, when it's not essential to the working of replace-brick
and other commands that use lazy umount.
----- Original Message -----
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 02:03:28AM -0400, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
> > IIRC, lazy umount is being used in glusterd to avoid leaving
> > behind an entry in /etc/mtab, for every internal mount that
> > failed to unmount for some reason. replace-brick command doesn't
> > have a requirement that the umount must happen in a lazy manner.
> And since *BSD do not have a /etc/mtab, there is really no requirement.
> I will resubmit a change without lazy umount emulation.
> Emmanuel Dreyfus
> manu at netbsd.org
More information about the Gluster-devel