[Gluster-devel] Data classification proposal

[Dan Lambright]

I don't think brick splitting implemented by LVM would affect directory browsing any more than adding an additional brick would,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Clift" <justin at gluster.org>
To: "Dan Lambright" <dlambrig at redhat.com>
Cc: "Shyamsundar Ranganathan" <srangana at redhat.com>, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel at gluster.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 12:01:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Data classification proposal

On 26/06/2014, at 4:54 PM, Dan Lambright wrote:
> Implementing brick splitting using LVM would allow you to treat each logical volume (split) as an independent brick. Each split would have its own .glusterfs subdirectory. I think this would help with taking snapshots as well.


Would brick splitting make directory browsing latency even scarier?

+ Justin

--
GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org

An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.

My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift