[Gluster-devel] bug-822830.t fails on release-3.5 branch

Niels de Vos ndevos at redhat.com
Fri Jul 4 06:53:48 UTC 2014


On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 11:51:45AM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote:
> On 07/04/2014 11:20 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> >
> >On 07/04/2014 11:19 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
> >>On 07/04/2014 11:09 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
> >>>Ravi,
> >>>I already sent a patch for it in the morning at
> >>>http://review.gluster.com/8233
> >>>Review please :-)
> >>>
> >>830665.t is identical in master where it succeeds. Looks like
> >>*match_subnet_v4() changes  in master need to be backported to
> >>3.5 as well.
> >That is because Avati's patch where EXPECT matches reg-ex is not
> >present on release-3.5
> >
> >commit 9a34ea6a0a95154013676cabf8528b2679fb36c4
> >Author: Anand Avati <avati at redhat.com>
> >Date:   Fri Jan 24 18:30:32 2014 -0800
> >
> >    tests: support regex in EXPECT constructs
> >
> >    Instead of just strings, provide the ability to specify a regex
> >    of the pattern to expect
> >
> >    Change-Id: I6ada978197dceecc28490a2a40de73a04ab9abcd
> >    Signed-off-by: Anand Avati <avati at redhat.com>
> >    Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/6788
> >    Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu at redhat.com>
> >    Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins at build.gluster.com>
> >
> >Shall we backport this?
> >
> 
> I think we should; reviewed http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8235/.
> Thanks for the fix :)

Thanks guys! Justin sent me a heads up on the 'should have failed 
regression testing' yesterday, but I was a little tied up. I was 
planning to look into the issue today, seems you already found it, 
wohoo! When this one passes regression tests, I'll merge it.

Many thanks,
Niels

> 
> >Pranith
> >>>Pranith
> >>>
> >>>On 07/04/2014 11:00 AM, Ravishankar N wrote:
> >>>>Hi Niels/ Santosh,
> >>>>
> >>>>tests/bugs/bug-830665.t is consistently failing on 3.5 branch:
> >>>>not ok 17 Got "*.redhat.com" instead of "\*.redhat.com"
> >>>>not ok 19 Got "192.168.10.[1-5]" instead of "192.168.10.\[1-5]"
> >>>>
> >>>>and seems to be introduced by http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8223/
> >>>>
> >>>>Could you please look into it?
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks,
> >>>>Ravi
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>Gluster-devel mailing list
> >>>>Gluster-devel at gluster.org
> >>>>http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >>>
> >>
> >
> 


More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list