[Gluster-devel] Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for GlusterFS

Vijay Bellur vbellur at redhat.com
Fri Jan 3 06:47:53 UTC 2014


On 01/02/2014 09:26 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
> On 01/02/2014 06:32 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/31/2013 04:53 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
>>> Here is the last Coverity scan report in 2013 for master branch of
>>> GlusterFS. I have tried to cover the whole code base for this Coverity
>>> scan by enabling possible translators. Happy new year Gluster Ants :)
>>
>> Thanks, Lala and Happy new year to you too! :)
>>
>>> Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to GlusterFS
>>> found with Coverity Scan.
>>>
>>> Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan
>>> Showing 7 of 291 defect(s)
>>
>> Avati, Brian: All these errors seem to be coming from the imported qemu
>> code. Do we mark them as false positives as we probably do not intend
>> fixing them?
>>
>
> That's what I would vote for, or to just skip scanning the imported qemu
> code if that is an option..?

Makes sense. There seems to be an option for skipping certain 
directories and I have added a filter to avoid getting issues reported 
from contrib/*.

-Vijay






More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list