[Gluster-devel] Asking about Gluster Performance Factors
John Mark Walker
johnmark at redhat.com
Wed May 16 14:38:50 UTC 2012
Hi Ethan,
----- Original Message -----
> Dear Gluster Dev Team :
> I'm Ethan, Assistant engineer in Samsung electronics. Reviewing your
> paper, I have some questions of performance factors in gluster.
Which paper? Can you provide a link?
Also, please note that this is a community mailing list, and we cannot guarantee quick response times here - if you need a fast response, I'm happy to put you through to the right people.
Thanks,
John Mark Walker
Gluster Community Guy
> First, what does it mean the option "performance.cache-*"? Does it
> mean read cache? If does, what's difference between the options
> "prformance.cache-max-file-size" and "performance.cache-size" ?
> I read your another paper("performance in a gluster system, versions
> 3.1.x") and it says as below on Page 12,
> (Gluster Native protocol does not implement write caching, as we
> believe that the modest performance improvements from rite caching
> do not justify the risk of cache coherency issues.)
> Second, how much is the read throughput improved as configuring 2-way
> replication? we need any statistics or something like that.
> ("performance in a gluster system, versions 3.1.x") and it says as
> below on Page 12,
> (However, read throughput is generally improved by replication, as
> reads can be delivered from either storage node)
> I would ask you to return ASAP.
More information about the Gluster-devel
mailing list