[Gluster-devel] inodes

Emmanuel Dreyfus manu at netbsd.org
Mon Oct 31 04:29:39 UTC 2011

Amar Tumballi <amarts at redhat.com> wrote:

> http://review.gluster.com/613 <--- for distribute itransform removing.

> With rebalance feature to be done inside distribute, most of the
> other fixes which went in only in master branch are also backported
> as part of rebalance, more syncops are added.

That one is huge. It brings ino fixes along with a lot of other changes.
Should I just extract the inode relevant part? Or is the whole change
self-contained (I mean not dependent on other changes) and will only
bring benefits?

Emmanuel Dreyfus
manu at netbsd.org

More information about the Gluster-devel mailing list