[Gluster-devel] Glusterfs 3.1.2 dht/switch

[Gvozden Neskovic]

Hi Anand,

Thank you for fast replay.
I am looking into GlusterFS to setup cluster of about 600 nodes with ~2TB
local disk
per node. This is only possible, with our workloads, if data locality is
somehow enforced,
so that data 'produced and consumed' by node stays on that node's local
disk, because there is no
dedicated network infrastructure. Data availability in case of node failures
is not of big concern.

Do you have any suggestions regarding glusterfs setup I can use?

Best Regards,

-- 
Gvozden Neskovic
neskovic at gmail.com


On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Anand Babu Periasamy <ab at gluster.com> wrote:

> Hi Gvozden, We have not tested switch translator in 3.1. Not enough
> interest around this translator as of now. My recommendation is to avoid
> this translator.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Gvozden Neskovic" <neskovic at gmail.com>
> *To: *gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> *Sent: *Tuesday, March 8, 2011 4:51:00 AM
> *Subject: *[Gluster-devel] Glusterfs 3.1.2 dht/switch
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I observed random misbehaving and crashes on setup with
> switch xlator on 20 nodes.
>
> Attached patch address following:
> memory leak in subvolume lookup,
> missing initialization in switch_create() and
> correct 'pattern.switch.case' option parsing.
>
> Best Regards.
>
> --
> Gvozden Neskovic
> neskovic at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel at nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/attachments/20110308/9dd80cb6/attachment-0003.html>