[Gluster-devel] Is this a valid AFR config?

[DeeDee Park]

Basically where the AFR is on top of two unify volumes.
 
 
volume brick1-500GB
   type protocol/client
   option transport-type tcp/client
   option remote-host 192.168.1.11
   option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume
volume brick2-500GB
   type protocol/client
   option transport-type tcp/client
   option remote-host 192.168.1.12
   option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume
volume brick3-500GB
   type protocol/client
   option transport-type tcp/client
   option remote-host 192.168.1.13
   option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume
 
volume brick4-750GB
   type protocol/client
   option transport-type tcp/client
   option remote-host 192.168.1.14
   option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume
volume brick5-750GB
   type protocol/client
   option transport-type tcp/client
   option remote-host 192.168.1.15
   option remote-subvolume brick
end-volume
 
volume bricks123-1500GB  type cluster/unify
  subvolumes brick1-500GB brick2-500GB brick3-500GB
  option scheduler alu
  option namespace brick-ns
end-volumevolume bricks56-1500GB  type cluster/unify
  subvolumes brick4-750B-4 brick5-750GBGB
  option scheduler alu
  option namespace brick-ns
end-volume
 
volume afr
   type cluster/afr
   subvolumes bricks123 bricks45
end-volume
 
_________________________________________________________________
i’m is proud to present Cause Effect, a series about real people making a difference.
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/MTV/?source=text_Cause_Effect