[susumu_urata at technocross.com: [Gluster-devel] Domain name and other behaviors]

[Susumu Urata (Technocross)]

> Was this in the same session? or did you reboot and select a new 
> state?

This was the same session.  After hitting "apply" and go back to the 
screen, the domain name is set back to the original as if the apply 
did not work for the domain name.

> The client nodes will stop at 'Starting gping daemon'. that is 
> correct
> behaviour. But they should be listed in the 'Active Nonde' dialog 
> box.

This was my mistake.  I tried with 4 clients and found the first one 
never get listed but other three were listed and downloading 
started.  I do not why the first client cannot get listed, though.

Thanks

Susumu Urata
Technical Consultant

408-873-2760 (Voice)
408-873-2761 (Fax)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anand Avati" <avati at zresearch.com>
To: "Anand Babu" <ab at gnu.org.in>
Cc: <susumu_urata at technocross.com>; <gluster-devel at nongnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: [susumu_urata at technocross.com: [Gluster-devel] Domain 
name and other behaviors]


> Susumu,
> replies inline.
>
>>
>> 1)  In HPC master configuration, I set the "Domain" name where 
>> originally
>> set to
>> "gluster.org" to my own domain.  When I came back to the same 
>> screen, the
>> domain name was set back to the default "gluster.org".  Is this a 
>> normal
>> behavior?
>
> Was this in the same session? or did you reboot and select a new 
> state?
>
>> 2) When I started the client servers as indicated in the master 
>> node setup,
>> it only captured the last server node I have started in the 
>> Active Node
>> dialogbox although the clients started to boot and stopped at 
>> "Starting
>> Gping daemon" message.  Is this a correct behavior?
>
> The client nodes will stop at 'Starting gping daemon'. that is 
> correct
> behaviour. But they should be listed in the 'Active Nonde' dialog 
> box.
>
>> 3) Only the last server node starts the trasfer of image although 
>> all of
>> the server MAC address has been recognized by the master node. 
>> Is this a
>> correct behavior?
>
> How many nodes are you trying with? (how many client nodes?)
>
> avati
>