[Bugs] [Bug 1733520] New: potential deadlock while processing callbacks in gfapi

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733520

            Bug ID: 1733520
           Summary: potential deadlock while processing callbacks in gfapi
           Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
           Version: rhgs-3.5
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
         Component: libgfapi
          Severity: high
          Assignee: pgurusid at redhat.com
          Reporter: skoduri at redhat.com
        QA Contact: vdas at redhat.com
                CC: bugs at gluster.org, jthottan at redhat.com,
                    rhs-bugs at redhat.com, sankarshan at redhat.com,
                    skoduri at redhat.com, storage-qa-internal at redhat.com
        Depends On: 1733166
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Red Hat



+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1733166 +++

Description of problem:

While running parallel I/Os involving many files on nfs-ganesha mount, have hit
below deadlock in the nfs-ganesha process.


epoll thread:
....glfs_cbk_upcall_data->upcall_syncop_args_init->glfs_h_poll_cache_invalidation->glfs_h_find_handle->priv_glfs_active_subvol->glfs_lock
(waiting on lock)

I/O thread:

...glfs_h_stat->glfs_resolve_inode->__glfs_resolve_inode (at this point we
acquired glfs_lock) -> ...->glfs_refresh_inode_safe->syncop_lookup

To summarize-
I/O thread which acquired glfs_lock are waiting for epoll threads to receive
response where as epoll threads are waiting for I/O threads to release lock. 

Similar issue was identified earlier (bug1693575).

There could be other issues at different layers depending on how client xlators
choose to process these callbacks.

The correct way of avoiding or fixing these issues is to re-design upcall model
which is to use different sockets for callback communication  instead of using
same epoll threads. Raised github issue for that -
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/697 

Since it may take a while, raising this BZ to provide a workaround fix in gfapi
layer for now 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2019-07-25 10:09:58 UTC ---

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/23107 (gfapi: Fix deadlock while processing
upcall) posted (#1) for review on release-6 by soumya k

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2019-07-25 10:16:57 UTC ---

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/23108 (gfapi: Fix deadlock while processing
upcall) posted (#1) for review on master by soumya k


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733166
[Bug 1733166] potential deadlock while processing callbacks in gfapi
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.